Chapter 396 Oregon Laws 2005
AN ACT
HB 2722
Relating to incorporation of city in urbanized area; amending ORS 221.031 and 221.034.
Be It Enacted by the People of the State of
Oregon:
SECTION 1. ORS 221.031 is amended to read:
221.031. (1) Before circulating a petition to incorporate unincorporated territory as a city, the petitioners shall file with the county clerk of the county in which the proposed city lies or, should it lie in more than one county, to the county clerk of the county in which the largest part of its territory lies, a petition for incorporation in a form prescribed by rule of the Secretary of State. If the economic feasibility statement required by ORS 221.035 is submitted with the petition, the county clerk shall immediately date and time stamp the prospective petition and shall authorize the circulation of the petition. The county clerk shall retain the prospective petition and economic feasibility statement and shall immediately send two copies of the prospective petition to the appropriate county court.
(2) A petition for incorporation filed with the county clerk under subsection (1) of this section shall designate the name and residence address of not more than three persons as chief petitioners, who shall be electors registered within the boundaries of the proposed city. The petition shall contain the name of the proposed city. The petition shall also include a proposed permanent rate limit for operating taxes that would generate operating tax revenues sufficient to support an adequate level of municipal services. The tax rate limit shall be expressed in dollars per thousand dollars of assessed value. The tax rate limit shall be calculated for the latest tax year for which the assessed value of the proposed city is available. There shall be attached to the cover sheet of the petition a map indicating the exterior boundaries of the proposed city. The map shall not exceed 14 inches by 17 inches in size and shall be used in lieu of a metes and bounds or legal description of the proposed city. If the territory proposed to be incorporated is within the jurisdiction of a local government boundary commission, the petition shall be accompanied by the economic feasibility analysis required under ORS 199.476 (1). Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, unless the economic feasibility analysis is approved by the local government boundary commission as provided in ORS 199.522, the county clerk shall not authorize the circulation of the petition.
(3) Each sheet of signatures shall be attached to a full and correct copy of the petition for incorporation. Not more than 20 signatures on each sheet of the petition for incorporation shall be counted. The circulator shall certify on each signature sheet that the individuals signed the sheet in the presence of the circulator and that the circulator believes each individual is an elector registered in the county. If the territory proposed to be incorporated is within the jurisdiction of a local government boundary commission, each signature sheet shall contain a statement that the economic feasibility analysis for the proposed city was approved by the boundary commission, that the analysis is available for inspection at the offices of the boundary commission and that subsequent to the gathering of the petitions the boundary commission must review and finally approve the proposal prior to submission at an election.
[(4) When any of the area proposed to be incorporated lies within an urbanized area, the petition required by subsections (1) and (2) of this section, in addition to the requirements of such subsections, and in order to be sufficient to allow for calling a public hearing under ORS 221.040, shall meet one of the following requirements:]
[(a) Be accompanied by a resolution approving the proposed incorporation adopted by the city or cities whose proximity would otherwise prohibit incorporation; or]
[(b) Be accompanied by an affidavit, signed by any person requesting incorporation, stating that the city or cities whose proximity would otherwise prohibit incorporation have failed to take any action pursuant to the request within 120 days of its submission.]
SECTION 2. ORS 221.034 is amended to read:
221.034. (1) As used in this section:
(a) “Neighboring city” means a city that has any part of its territory situated within three miles of the area proposed to be incorporated.
(b) “Rural unincorporated community” means a settlement with a boundary identified in an acknowledged comprehensive plan of a county and that:
(A) Is made up primarily of lands subject to an exception to statewide planning goals related to agricultural lands or forestlands;
(B) Either was identified in the acknowledged comprehensive plan of a county as a “rural community,” “service center,” “rural center,” “resort community” or similar term before October 28, 1994, or is listed in the Department of Land Conservation and Development’s “Survey of Oregon Unincorporated Communities” (January 30, 1997);
(C) Lies outside the urban growth boundary of a city or a metropolitan service district; and
(D) Is not incorporated as a city.
(c) “Urban reserve area” has the meaning given that term in ORS 195.145.
(d) “Urban services” has the meaning given that term in ORS 195.065.
(2) [Notwithstanding ORS 221.031 (4),] When any of the area proposed to be incorporated as a city lies within an urbanized area, but outside the urban growth boundary of a city or a metropolitan service district:
(a) The area proposed to be incorporated must also be located entirely within a designated rural unincorporated community and contiguous lands subject to an exception to statewide planning goals related to agricultural lands or forestlands.
(b) The petition required by ORS 221.031 must be accompanied by an affidavit, signed by a chief petitioner, stating that:
(A) Ten percent of the electors registered within the area proposed for incorporation favor the incorporation; and
(B) The chief petitioners have engaged the neighboring cities in discussions concerning the effects of the proposed incorporation, including discussions specifically relating to how those cities and the proposed city will allow for expansion of urban growth boundaries and, where applicable, for creation or expansion of urban reserve areas.
(c) The economic feasibility statement required by ORS 221.035 must:
(A) Indicate that the proposed city must plan for and provide urban services in a cost-effective manner at the minimum level adequate to meet current needs and projected growth;
(B) Contain a proposed permanent rate limit for operating taxes to provide revenues for urban services; and
(C) Indicate that the proposed city must plan for residential development at or above the same urban density planned for an existing city, within the county, that has a similar geographic area within the existing city’s urban growth boundary or, for a proposed city within three miles of Metro’s boundary, a minimum urban residential density in accordance with a statewide planning goal and rules pertaining to needed housing for cities within Metro’s urban growth boundary.
(d) If the proposed city will be required to complete a public facility plan and a transportation systems plan, the proposed city must demonstrate the ability to provide urban services to meet current needs and projected growth. The proposed city may meet this requirement, in whole or in part, by establishing an agreement in principle with a city or a district, as defined in ORS 195.060, to provide the urban services.
(3) If the governing body of a neighboring city determines that the proposed incorporation adversely affects that city, the governing body may ask the county court with which the petition for incorporation was filed to reject the petition and terminate the incorporation proceedings. The objections by the city to the incorporation shall be heard and considered by the county court at a public hearing held under ORS 221.040.
(4) If, at the hearing held under ORS 221.040, the county court finds that any of the requirements of subsection (2) of this section are not met or that the proposed incorporation will adversely affect a neighboring city, the county court shall provide by order for the termination of the incorporation proceedings. The order shall contain the findings of the county court relating to the proposed incorporation and the reasons for terminating the incorporation proceedings.
(5) In the manner provided in ORS 197.830 to 197.845, the Land Use Board of Appeals shall review, upon the petition of a party to the incorporation proceedings, the order of the county court under subsection (4) of this section.
Approved by the Governor June 29, 2005
Filed in the office of Secretary of State June 29, 2005
Effective date January 1, 2006
__________