Chapter 176 Oregon Laws 2007
AN ACT
SB 722
Relating to land use planning within metropolitan service district;
creating new provisions; and amending ORS 197.319, 197.320 and 268.390.
Be It Enacted by the People of
the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1.
ORS 268.390 is amended to read:
268.390. (1) A district
may define and apply a planning procedure [which]
that identifies and designates areas and activities having significant
impact upon the orderly and responsible development of the metropolitan area,
including, but not limited to, impact on:
(a) Air quality;
(b) Water quality; and
(c) Transportation.
(2) A district may
prepare and adopt functional plans for those areas designated under subsection
(1) of this section to control metropolitan area impact on air and water
quality, transportation and other aspects of metropolitan area development the
district may identify.
(3) A district shall
adopt an urban growth boundary for the district in compliance with applicable
goals adopted under ORS chapters 195, 196 and 197.
(4) A district may
review the comprehensive plans [in effect
on January 1, 1979, or subsequently] adopted by the cities and counties
within the district [which] that
affect areas designated by the district under subsection (1) of this section or
the urban growth boundary adopted under subsection (3) of this section and
recommend or require cities and counties, as it considers necessary, to make
changes in any plan to [assure] ensure
that the plan and any actions taken under [it
conform to] the plan substantially comply with the district’s
functional plans adopted under subsection (2) of this section and its urban
growth boundary adopted under subsection (3) of this section.
(5) Pursuant to a
regional framework plan, a district may adopt implementing ordinances that:
(a) Require local
comprehensive plans and implementing regulations to substantially comply
with the regional framework plan within two years after compliance
acknowledgment.
(b) Require adjudication
and determination by the district of the consistency of local comprehensive
plans with the regional framework plan.
(c) Require each city
and county within the jurisdiction of the district and making land use
decisions concerning lands within the land use jurisdiction of the district to
make those decisions consistent with the regional framework plan. The
obligation to apply the regional framework plan to land use decisions shall not
begin until one year after the regional framework plan is acknowledged as
complying with the statewide planning goals adopted under ORS chapters 195, 196
and 197.
(d) Require changes in
local land use standards and procedures if the district determines that changes
are necessary to remedy a pattern or practice of decision-making inconsistent
with the regional framework plan.
(6) A process
established by the district to enforce the requirements of this section must
provide:
(a) Notice of
noncompliance to the city or county.
(b) Opportunity for the
city or county to be heard.
(c) Entry of an order by
the district explaining its findings, conclusions and enforcement remedies, if
any.
(7) Enforcement remedies
ordered under subsection (6) of this section may include, but are not limited
to:
(a) Direct application
of specified requirements of functional plans to land use decisions by the city
or county;
(b) Withholding by the
district of discretionary funds from the city or county; and
(c) Requesting an
enforcement action pursuant to ORS 197.319 to 197.335 and withholding moneys
pursuant to an enforcement order resulting from the enforcement action.
(8) An order issued
under subsection (6) of this section:
(a) Must provide for
relief from enforcement remedies upon action by the city or county that brings
the comprehensive plan and implementing regulations into substantial compliance
with the requirement.
(b) Is subject to review
under ORS 197.830 to 197.845 as a land use decision.
[(6)] (9) The regional framework plan, ordinances that
implement the regional framework plan and any determination by the district of
consistency with the regional framework plan are subject to review under ORS
197.274.
SECTION 2.
ORS 197.319 is amended to read:
197.319. (1) Before a
person may request adoption of an enforcement order under ORS 197.320, the
person shall:
(a) Present the reasons,
in writing, for such an order to the affected local government; and
(b) Request:
(A) Revisions to the
local comprehensive plan, land use regulations, special district cooperative or
urban service agreement or decision-making process which is the basis for the
order; or
(B) That an action be
taken regarding the local comprehensive plan, land use regulations, special
district agreement or decision-making process that is the basis for the order.
(2)(a) The local
government or special district shall issue a written response to the request
within 60 days of the date the request is mailed to the local government or
special district.
(b) The requestor and
the local government or special district may enter into mediation to resolve
issues in the request. The Department of Land Conservation and Development
shall provide mediation services when jointly requested by the local government
or special district and the requestor.
(c) If the local
government or special district does not act in a manner which the requestor
believes is adequate to address the issues raised in the request within the
time period provided in paragraph (a) of this subsection, a petition may be
presented to the Land Conservation and Development Commission under ORS 197.324.
(3) A metropolitan
service district may request an enforcement order under ORS 197.320 (12)
without first complying with subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
SECTION 3.
ORS 197.320 is amended to read:
197.320. The Land
Conservation and Development Commission shall issue an order requiring a local
government, state agency or special district to take action necessary to bring
its comprehensive plan, land use regulation, limited land use decisions or
other land use decisions into compliance with the goals, acknowledged
comprehensive plan provisions or land use regulations if the commission has
good cause to believe:
(1) A comprehensive plan
or land use regulation adopted by a local government not on a compliance
schedule is not in compliance with the goals by the date set in ORS 197.245 or
197.250 for such compliance;
(2) A plan, program,
rule or regulation affecting land use adopted by a state agency or special
district is not in compliance with the goals by the date set in ORS 197.245 or
197.250 for such compliance;
(3) A local government
is not making satisfactory progress toward performance of its compliance
schedule;
(4) A state agency is
not making satisfactory progress in carrying out its coordination agreement or
the requirements of ORS 197.180;
(5) A local government
has no comprehensive plan or land use regulation and is not on a compliance
schedule directed to developing the plan or regulation;
(6) A local government
has engaged in a pattern or practice of decision making that violates an
acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation. In making its
determination under this subsection, the commission shall determine whether
there is evidence in the record to support the decisions made. The commission
shall not judge the issue solely upon adequacy of the findings in support of
the decisions;
(7) A local government
has failed to comply with a commission order entered under ORS 197.644;
(8) A special district
has engaged in a pattern or practice of decision-making that violates an acknowledged
comprehensive plan or cooperative agreement adopted pursuant to ORS 197.020;
(9) A special district
is not making satisfactory progress toward performance of its obligations under
ORS chapters 195 and 197;
(10) A local government
is applying approval standards, special conditions on approval of specific
development proposals or procedures for approval that do not comply with ORS
197.307 (6); or
(11) A local government
is not making satisfactory progress toward meeting its obligations under ORS
195.065.
(12) A local
government within the jurisdiction of a metropolitan service district has
failed to make changes to the comprehensive plan or land use regulations to
comply with the regional framework plan of the district or has engaged in a
pattern or practice of decision-making that violates a requirement of the
regional framework plan.
SECTION 4. The
amendments to ORS 197.319, 197.320 and 268.390 by sections 1 to 3 of this 2007
Act apply to a regional framework plan and functional plans of a metropolitan
service district that are in effect on the effective date of this 2007 Act and
to changes in the regional framework plan or functional plans that take effect
on or after the effective date of this 2007 Act.
Approved by the Governor May 25, 2007
Filed in the office of Secretary of State May 25, 2007
Effective date January 1, 2008
__________