Chapter 118
Oregon Laws 2011
AN ACT
HB 2828
Relating to
service as a juror; creating new provisions; amending ORS 10.090 and 659A.885;
and repealing ORS 10.992.
Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1. Section 2 of this 2011
Act is added to and made a part of ORS chapter 10.
SECTION 2. (1) An employer who
employs 10 or more persons commits an unlawful employment practice under ORS
chapter 659A if:
(a) The employer ceases to provide
health, disability, life or other insurance coverage for an employee during
times when the employee serves or is scheduled to serve as a juror; and
(b) The employee elected to have
coverage continued while the employee served or was scheduled to serve as a
juror, and the employee provided notice of that election to the employer in
compliance with the employer’s policy for notification.
(2) Notwithstanding ORS 652.610 (3),
if, following an election described in subsection (1) of this section, an
employer is required or elects to pay any part of the costs of providing
health, disability, life or other insurance coverage for the employee that
should have been paid by the employee, the employer may deduct from the
employee’s pay such amounts upon the employee’s return to work until the amount
the employer advanced toward the payments is paid. The total amount deducted
for insurance under this subsection may not exceed 10 percent of the employee’s
gross pay each pay period.
(3) Notwithstanding ORS 652.610 (3),
if the employer pays any part of the costs of providing health, disability,
life or other insurance coverage for an employee under subsection (2) of this
section, and the employee ceases to work for the employer before the total
amount the employer advanced toward the payments is paid, the employer may
deduct the remaining amounts from any amounts owed by the employer to the
employee or may seek to recover those amounts by any other legal means.
(4) An employee who alleges a
violation of this section may bring a civil action under ORS 659A.885 or may
file a complaint with the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries in
the manner provided by ORS 659A.820.
SECTION 3. ORS 10.090 is amended to
read:
10.090. (1) An employer [shall not discharge or threaten to
discharge, intimidate, or coerce] commits an unlawful employment
practice under ORS chapter 659A if the employer discharges, threatens to
discharge, intimidates or coerces any employee by reason of the employee’s
service or scheduled service as a juror on a grand jury, trial jury or jury of
inquest.
(2) This section [shall] may not be construed to alter or affect an employer’s
policies or agreements with employees concerning employees’ wages during times
when an employee serves or is scheduled to serve as a juror.
(3) When summoning jurors, the person
whose duty it is under the law to summon shall notify each juror of the juror’s
rights under this section.
[(4)
Upon complaint filed by a prospective juror or a juror who has served or upon
petition of the district attorney, the circuit court shall have jurisdiction to
prevent and restrain violations of this section by issuing appropriate orders,
including but not limited to, reinstatement of an employee discharged by reason
of service as a juror, with back pay for the time the employee was discharged.]
(4) An employee who alleges a
violation of subsection (1) of this section may bring a civil action under ORS
659A.885 or may file a complaint with the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor
and Industries in the manner provided by ORS 659A.820.
SECTION 4. ORS 659A.885, as amended
by section 3, chapter 102, Oregon Laws 2010, is amended to read:
659A.885. (1) Any person claiming to
be aggrieved by an unlawful practice specified in subsection (2) of this
section may file a civil action in circuit court. In any action under this
subsection, the court may order injunctive relief and any other equitable
relief that may be appropriate, including but not limited to reinstatement or
the hiring of employees with or without back pay. A court may order back pay in
an action under this subsection only for the two-year period immediately
preceding the filing of a complaint under ORS 659A.820 with the Commissioner of
the Bureau of Labor and Industries, or if a complaint was not filed before the
action was commenced, the two-year period immediately preceding the filing of
the action. In any action under this subsection, the court may allow the
prevailing party costs and reasonable attorney fees at trial and on appeal.
Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section:
(a) The judge shall determine the
facts in an action under this subsection; and
(b) Upon any appeal of a judgment in
an action under this subsection, the appellate court shall review the judgment
pursuant to the standard established by ORS 19.415 (3).
(2) An action may be brought under
subsection (1) of this section alleging a violation of ORS 10.090,
25.337, 25.424, 171.120, 408.230, 476.574, 652.355, 653.060, 659A.030,
659A.040, 659A.043, 659A.046, 659A.063, 659A.069, 659A.082, 659A.088, 659A.103
to 659A.145, 659A.150 to 659A.186, 659A.194, 659A.199, 659A.203, 659A.218,
659A.230, 659A.233, 659A.236, 659A.250 to 659A.262, 659A.277, 659A.290,
659A.300, 659A.306, 659A.309, 659A.315, 659A.318 or 659A.421 or section 2,
chapter 102, Oregon Laws 2010, or section 2 of this 2011 Act.
(3) In any action under subsection (1)
of this section alleging a violation of ORS 25.337, 25.424, 659A.030, 659A.040,
659A.043, 659A.046, 659A.069, 659A.082, 659A.103 to 659A.145, 659A.199,
659A.230, 659A.250 to 659A.262, 659A.290, 659A.318 or 659A.421:
(a) The court may award, in addition
to the relief authorized under subsection (1) of this section, compensatory
damages or $200, whichever is greater, and punitive damages;
(b) At the request of any party, the
action shall be tried to a jury;
(c) Upon appeal of any judgment
finding a violation, the appellate court shall review the judgment pursuant to
the standard established by ORS 19.415 (1); and
(d) Any attorney fee agreement shall
be subject to approval by the court.
(4) In any action under subsection (1)
of this section alleging a violation of ORS 652.355 or 653.060, the court may
award, in addition to the relief authorized under subsection (1) of this
section, compensatory damages or $200, whichever is greater.
(5) In any action under subsection (1)
of this section alleging a violation of ORS 171.120, 476.574, 659A.203 or
659A.218, the court may award, in addition to the relief authorized under
subsection (1) of this section, compensatory damages or $250, whichever is
greater.
(6) In any action under subsection
(1) of this section alleging a violation of ORS 10.090 or section 2 of this
2011 Act, the court may award, in addition to the relief authorized under
subsection (1) of this section, a civil penalty in the amount of $720.
[(6)]
(7) Any individual against whom any distinction, discrimination or
restriction on account of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation,
national origin, marital status or age, if the individual is 18 years of age or
older, has been made by any place of public accommodation, as defined in ORS
659A.400, by any employee or person acting on behalf of the place or by any
person aiding or abetting the place or person in violation of ORS 659A.406 may
bring an action against the operator or manager of the place, the employee or
person acting on behalf of the place or the aider or abettor of the place or
person. Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, in an action under this
subsection:
(a) The court may award, in addition
to the relief authorized under subsection (1) of this section, compensatory and
punitive damages;
(b) The operator or manager of the
place of public accommodation, the employee or person acting on behalf of the
place, and any aider or abettor shall be jointly and severally liable for all
damages awarded in the action;
(c) At the request of any party, the
action shall be tried to a jury;
(d) The court shall award reasonable
attorney fees to a prevailing plaintiff;
(e) The court may award reasonable
attorney fees and expert witness fees incurred by a defendant who prevails only
if the court determines that the plaintiff had no objectively reasonable basis
for asserting a claim or no reasonable basis for appealing an adverse decision
of a trial court; and
(f) Upon any appeal of a judgment
under this subsection, the appellate court shall review the judgment pursuant
to the standard established by ORS 19.415 (1).
[(7)]
(8) When the commissioner or the Attorney General has reasonable cause
to believe that a person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or
practice of resistance to the rights protected by ORS 659A.145 or 659A.421 or
federal housing law, or that a group of persons has been denied any of the
rights protected by ORS 659A.145 or 659A.421 or federal housing law, the
commissioner or the Attorney General may file a civil action on behalf of the
aggrieved persons in the same manner as a person or group of persons may file a
civil action under this section. In a civil action filed under this subsection,
the court may assess against the respondent, in addition to the relief
authorized under subsections (1) and (3) of this section, a civil penalty:
(a) In an amount not exceeding $50,000
for a first violation; and
(b) In an amount not exceeding
$100,000 for any subsequent violation.
[(8)]
(9) In any action under subsection (1) of this section alleging a
violation of ORS 659A.145 or 659A.421 or alleging discrimination under federal
housing law, when the commissioner is pursuing the action on behalf of an aggrieved
complainant, the court shall award reasonable attorney fees to the commissioner
if the commissioner prevails in the action. The court may award reasonable
attorney fees and expert witness fees incurred by a defendant that prevails in
the action if the court determines that the commissioner had no objectively
reasonable basis for asserting the claim or for appealing an adverse decision
of the trial court.
[(9)]
(10) In an action under subsection (1) or [(7)] (8) of this section alleging a violation of ORS
659A.145 or 659A.421 or discrimination under federal housing law:
(a) “Aggrieved person” includes a
person who believes that the person:
(A) Has been injured by an unlawful
practice or discriminatory housing practice; or
(B) Will be injured by an unlawful
practice or discriminatory housing practice that is about to occur.
(b) An aggrieved person in regard to
issues to be determined in an action may intervene as of right in the action.
The Attorney General may intervene in the action if the Attorney General
certifies that the case is of general public importance. The court may allow an
intervenor prevailing party costs and reasonable attorney fees at trial and on
appeal.
SECTION 5. ORS 10.992 is repealed.
Approved by
the Governor May 19, 2011
Filed in the
office of Secretary of State May 19, 2011
Effective date
January 1, 2012
__________