Chapter 659
Oregon Laws 2011
AN ACT
HB 2663
Relating to
crime; amending ORS 147.508, 147.512, 147.515 and 147.537; and declaring an
emergency.
Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1. ORS 147.512 is amended to
read:
147.512. (1) Notwithstanding ORS
147.510, at the beginning of [any]
each judicial settlement conference, plea hearing [and any] or sentencing hearing, the prosecuting attorney
shall inform the court whether the victim is present. If the victim is not
present and the case involves a defendant charged with a violent felony, the
prosecuting attorney shall inform the court whether the victim was informed of
the conference or hearing.
(2) In any case involving a defendant
charged with a violent felony:
(a) If the victim requests, the
prosecuting attorney shall make reasonable efforts to consult the victim [regarding plea discussions] before
making a [final] plea offer and
before entering into a final plea agreement.
(b) Before the court accepts a plea of
guilty or no contest:
(A) If the victim is present, the
court shall ask whether the victim was consulted regarding plea
negotiations, if the victim agrees or disagrees with the plea agreement as
presented to the court and whether the victim wishes to be heard regarding the
plea agreement.
(B) If the victim is not present, the
court shall ask the prosecuting attorney whether the victim requested to be [notified] informed and consulted
regarding plea negotiations. If the victim made such a request, the court shall
ask the prosecuting attorney what reasonable efforts to inform and consult
the victim concerning plea negotiations were made and whether the victim
agrees or disagrees with the plea agreement.
(c) If the court finds that the victim
requested consultation regarding plea negotiations and that the prosecuting
attorney failed to make reasonable efforts to consult [with] the victim, the court shall direct the prosecuting attorney
to make reasonable efforts to consult [with]
the victim and may not accept the plea unless the court makes a finding on the
record that the interests of justice require the acceptance of the plea.
(3) Before the court imposes sentence,
the court shall ask whether the victim wishes to express the views described in
ORS 137.013.
SECTION 2. ORS 147.508 is amended to
read:
147.508. (1) At the request of a
victim, the prosecuting attorney may request that the court schedule a hearing
to reconsider a release decision if:
(a) The victim did not have notice of,
or an opportunity to be heard at, a hearing in which the court released the
defendant from custody or reduced the defendant’s security amount; and
(b) The victim’s request is made no
later than [seven] 30days
after the victim knew or reasonably should have known of the release decision
that is to be reconsidered.
(2) As used in this section, “release
decision” includes:
(a) Decisions made at arraignment; and
(b) Decisions made at hearings
described in ORS 419C.273 (4)(b)(A) to (C).
SECTION 3. ORS 147.515 is amended to
read:
147.515. (1) A victim who wishes to
allege a violation of a right granted to the victim in a criminal proceeding by
section 42 or 43, Article I of the Oregon Constitution, shall inform the court
within [seven] 30 days of the
date the victim knew or reasonably should have known of the facts supporting
the allegation. The victim shall describe the facts supporting the allegation
and propose a remedy.
(2) The victim may inform the court of
a claim:
(a) On a form prescribed by the Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court; or
(b) On the record in open court and in
the presence of the defendant and the prosecuting attorney.
(3) If the victim informs the court of
a facially valid claim on a form under subsection (2)(a) of this section, the
court shall promptly issue the order to show cause described in ORS 147.517.
(4) If the victim informs the court of
a facially valid claim orally under subsection (2)(b) of this section and the
court determines:
(a) That each person entitled to
notice of the claim and a reasonable opportunity to be heard is present, the
court shall hold a hearing under ORS 147.530 as soon as practicable; or
(b) That any person entitled to notice
of the claim and a reasonable opportunity to be heard is not present, the court
shall issue the order to show cause described in ORS 147.517.
(5) If the court determines that the
victim has not alleged a facially valid claim, the court shall enter an order
dismissing the claim. The order must:
(a) Include the reasons the claim was
dismissed;
(b) Be without prejudice to file,
within seven days from the date the victim receives the order dismissing the
claim, a corrected claim for the sole purpose of correcting the deficiency
identified by the court; and
(c) Be in writing, unless the order is
issued on the record in open court in the presence of the victim, the
prosecuting attorney and the defendant. If the court issues the order orally
under this paragraph, the court shall issue a written order as soon as
practicable.
(6) If a victim informs the court of a
claim orally and the court does not immediately hear the matter, the court may
require the victim to complete the form described in subsection (2)(a) of this
section.
SECTION 4. ORS 147.537 is amended to
read:
147.537. (1) Appellate review of an
order described in ORS 147.535 (4)(a) must be initiated by filing a notice of
interlocutory appeal with the Supreme Court substantially in the form
prescribed by rule of the Supreme Court. Review of the order is a matter of
right.
(2) The person filing the notice of
interlocutory appeal shall be identified as the appellant and the defendant
shall be identified as the respondent. Any other person described in subsection
(6)(a) to (f) of this section who is a party to the appeal shall be identified
as a respondent.
(3) The notice of interlocutory appeal
must contain:
(a) A designation of those portions of
the trial court record, including oral proceedings, to be included in the
record on appeal; and
(b) A statement of why the notice is
timely.
(4) The appellant shall include with
the notice of interlocutory appeal the following materials:
(a) A copy of the order for which
appellate review is sought, which must be attached to the notice.
(b) Excerpts of the record necessary
to determine the question presented and the relief sought. An excerpt of record
must include a copy of the form described in ORS 147.515 (2)(a), if the form
was completed and provided to the trial court.
(c) A memorandum of law containing:
(A) A concise but complete statement
of facts material to a determination of the question presented and the relief
sought; and
(B) Supporting arguments and citations
of authority.
(5) The Supreme Court may:
(a) Direct a party to the appeal to
supplement the record with a copy of additional parts of the record or a
transcript of the parts of the oral proceedings in the trial court necessary to
determine the question presented and the relief sought; or
(b) Direct the trial court
administrator to forward all or part of the trial court record.
(6) The appellant shall serve a copy
of the notice of interlocutory appeal and the accompanying materials described
in subsection (4) of this section on the following other persons:
(a) The victim who asserted the claim
that resulted in the order being appealed and any victim who asserted a related
claim;
(b) Any person who filed a response
under ORS 147.517 (4) to the claim that resulted in the order being appealed or
a related claim;
(c) Any person who filed the motion
that resulted in the order being appealed or a related motion under ORS
147.522;
(d) Any person against whom relief was
sought in the hearing that resulted in the order being appealed or a related
hearing under ORS 147.530;
(e) The prosecuting attorney;
(f) The Attorney General;
(g) The defendant; and
(h) The office of public defense
services established under ORS 151.216, if the defendant is represented by
appointed counsel.
(7) The appellant shall serve a copy
of the notice of interlocutory appeal on:
(a) The trial court administrator; and
(b) The trial court transcript
coordinator, if the notice of interlocutory appeal contains a designation of
the oral proceedings before the trial court as part of the record on appeal.
(8)(a) Except as otherwise provided in
this subsection, the appellant shall serve and file the notice of interlocutory
appeal and, if applicable, the accompanying materials described in subsection
(4) of this section within seven days after the date the trial court issued the
order being appealed.
(b) The appellant shall serve the prosecuting
attorney and the Attorney General so that the copy of the notice of
interlocutory appeal and accompanying materials are received on the same day
the notice is filed with the Supreme Court.
(c) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this subsection, the appellant shall serve all persons described in
subsections (6) and (7) of this section so that the copy of the notice of
interlocutory appeal and, if applicable, accompanying materials are received no
later than one judicial day after the notice is filed.
(9) Within three days after receipt of
a notice of interlocutory appeal that contains a designation of record under
subsection (3) of this section, the trial court administrator shall forward to
the Supreme Court an audio record of the designated oral proceedings.
(10) If the Supreme Court directs a
party to provide a transcript of oral proceedings under subsection (5) of this
section, the party shall provide the transcript to the Supreme Court within
seven days after the date of the Supreme Court’s order.
(11)(a) The following requirements are
jurisdictional and may not be waived or extended:
(A) The timely filing of the original
notice of interlocutory appeal and accompanying materials described in
subsection (4) of this section with the Supreme Court; and
(B) The service of the notice of
interlocutory appeal within the time limits described in subsection (8) of this
section on all persons identified in subsection (6) of this section.
(b) Failure to timely serve a true and
complete copy of the accompanying materials described in subsection (4) of this
section is not jurisdictional, provided that the appellant made a good faith
effort to do so and substantially complied with those requirements.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of
this subsection, the Supreme Court may dismiss the appeal as to any respondent
if the appellant, after receipt of a notice of noncompliance, does not promptly
cure a deficiency in the materials or if the failure to timely serve a true and
complete copy of the accompanying materials substantially prejudices the
respondent’s ability to respond to the appeal.
(12) A respondent may file a response,
which must be filed within seven days after the date the notice of
interlocutory appeal is filed with the Supreme Court.
(13)(a) Except as provided in
paragraph (b) of this subsection, the appellant may not file a reply.
(b) If the Supreme Court determines
that the case is unusually complex, due to the number of persons involved or
the existence of novel questions of law, and the court would benefit from
additional briefing, the court may extend the briefing schedule described in
this section and allow the appellant to file a reply.
(14) The appellant or respondent may
request oral argument. The Supreme Court may grant or deny a request for oral
argument or order oral argument on its own motion.
(15) At any time after submission of
the appellant’s memorandum of law, the Supreme Court, on its own motion or on
the motion of the respondent, may summarily affirm the trial court’s order,
with or without the submission of a response or oral argument, if the Supreme
Court determines that the appeal does not present a substantial question of
law. A motion for summary affirmance has no effect on the timelines described
in this section.
(16)(a) Except as provided in
paragraph (b) of this subsection, the Supreme Court shall issue its decision on
appeal under this section within 21 days after the date the notice of
interlocutory appeal is filed.
(b) The Supreme Court may issue a
final decision beyond the 21-day period if the court determines that the ends
of justice served by issuing a final decision at a later date outweigh the best
interests of the victim, the prosecuting attorney, the defendant, any person
against whom relief was ordered and the public.
(c) In making the determination under
paragraph (b) of this subsection, the Supreme Court shall consider:
(A) Whether the case is unusually
complex, due to the number of persons involved or the existence of novel
questions of law, and whether 21 days is an unreasonable amount of time for the
court to issue a decision; and
(B) Whether the failure to extend the
21-day period would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice.
(17) Appellate review under this
section is confined to the record. The Supreme Court may not substitute its
judgment for that of the trial court as to any issue of fact and shall review
challenges to a factual finding for evidence in the record to support the
finding. The Supreme Court shall review for errors of law and, when the law
delegates discretion to the trial court, determine whether the trial court’s
exercise of discretion was outside the range of discretion delegated to the
trial court.
(18) The Supreme Court may affirm,
modify, reverse or remand the trial court’s order. The court may reverse or
remand the order only if it finds that the order is unlawful in substance or
procedure and that the substantial rights of the appellant were prejudiced as a
result.
(19) Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, a notice of interlocutory appeal and the response described
in subsection (12) of this section are filed under this section when those
documents are physically received by the Supreme Court or, if the documents are
filed electronically, as provided by rule of the Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court.
(20) In addition to any other
method authorized by law, service under this section may be accomplished by
electronic mail or facsimile transmission, in a manner consistent with any
applicable rules of appellate procedure.
SECTION 5. This 2011 Act being
necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and
safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this 2011 Act takes effect on
its passage.
Approved by
the Governor August 2, 2011
Filed in the
office of Secretary of State August 2, 2011
Effective date
August 2, 2011
__________