Chapter 141 Oregon Laws 1999
Session Law
AN ACT
SB 394
Relating to parole release
dates; creating new provisions; and amending ORS 144.125 and 144.335.
Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1.
ORS 144.125 is amended to read:
144.125. (1) Prior to the scheduled release of any prisoner on
parole and prior to release rescheduled under this section, the State Board of
Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may upon request of the Department of
Corrections or on its own initiative interview the prisoner to review the
prisoner's parole plan and psychiatric or psychological report, if any, and the
record of the prisoner's conduct during confinement. To accommodate such review
by the board, the Department of Corrections shall provide to the board any
psychiatric or psychological reports held by the department regarding the
prisoner. However, if the psychiatrist or psychologist who prepared any report
or any treating psychiatrist or psychologist determines that disclosure to the
prisoner of the contents of the report would be detrimental to the prisoner's
mental or emotional health, the psychiatrist or psychologist may indorse upon
the report a recommendation that it not be disclosed to the prisoner. The
department may withhold from the board any report so indorsed.
(2) The board shall postpone a prisoner's scheduled release
date if it finds, after a hearing, that the prisoner engaged in serious
misconduct during confinement. The board shall adopt rules defining serious
misconduct and specifying periods of postponement for such misconduct.
(3)(a) If the board finds the prisoner has a [mental or] present severe emotional disturbance[, deficiency, condition or disorder predisposing the prisoner to the
commission of a crime to a degree rendering the prisoner] such as to constitute a danger to the
health or safety of the community, the board may order the postponement of the
scheduled parole release until a specified future date.
(b) If the board finds the prisoner has a [mental or] present severe
emotional disturbance[, deficiency,
condition or disorder predisposing the prisoner to the commission of a crime to
a degree rendering the prisoner] such
as to constitute a danger to the health or safety of the community, but
also finds that the prisoner can be adequately controlled with supervision and
mental health treatment and that the necessary supervision and treatment are
available, the board may order the prisoner released on parole subject to
conditions that are in the best interests of community safety and the
prisoner's welfare.
(4) Each prisoner shall furnish the board with a parole plan
prior to the scheduled release of the prisoner on parole. The board shall adopt
rules specifying the elements of an adequate parole plan and may defer release
of the prisoner for not more than three months if it finds that the parole plan
is inadequate. The Department of Corrections shall assist prisoners in
preparing parole plans.
SECTION 2. The amendments to ORS 144.125 by section 1
of this 1999 Act apply to any decision made by the State Board of Parole and
Post-Prison Supervision on or after July 13, 1993.
SECTION 3.
ORS 144.335 is amended to read:
144.335. (1) When a person over whom the State Board of Parole and
Post-Prison Supervision exercises its jurisdiction is adversely affected or
aggrieved by a final order of the board related to the granting, revoking or
discharging of parole, the revoking of post-prison supervision or the
imposition of conditions of parole or of post-prison supervision and after
exhaustion of administrative review as provided by board rule, such person is
entitled to judicial review of the final order.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, the board's
order is final and is not subject to judicial review when the board sustains a
minimum term imposed under ORS 144.110 and the prisoner does not contest the
crime severity rating or the history risk score established by the board under
its rules.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, the board's
order is final and is not subject to judicial review when the board makes any
decision relating to a release date or a parole consideration hearing date,
including:
(a) Setting an initial release date under ORS 144.120, except
that the setting of an initial release date under ORS 144.120 remains subject
to judicial review if the prisoner contests the crime severity rating, the
history risk score or aggravation factors found by the board under the rules of
the board.
(b) Setting a date for a parole consideration hearing under ORS
144.228.
(c) Setting a release date, or declining to set a release date,
after a parole consideration hearing under ORS 144.228.
(d) Denying, granting or granting in part a prisoner's request
under ORS 144.122 for advancement of the initial release date.
(e) Referring a prisoner for psychological evaluation under ORS
144.223.
(f) Postponing a prisoner's release date because of serious
misconduct during confinement under ORS 144.125 (2).
(g) Postponing a prisoner's release date because of a [psychological diagnosis] board finding under ORS 144.125 (3).
(h) Postponing a prisoner's release date because of a
prisoner's refusal to submit to a psychological evaluation.
(i) Denying a prisoner's request under ORS 144.228 (1) for an
early parole consideration hearing.
(4) The final order and the proceedings underlying the order
are subject to review by the Court of Appeals upon petition to that court filed
within 60 days of the final order for which review is sought. The board shall
submit to the court the record of the proceeding, or, if the inmate agrees, a
shortened record. A copy of the record transmitted shall be delivered to the
inmate by the board.
(5) The court may affirm, reverse or remand the order on the
same basis as provided in ORS 183.482 (8). The filing of the petition shall not
stay the board's order, but the board may do so, or the court may order a stay
upon application on such terms as it deems proper.
(6) In the case of disputed allegations of irregularities in
procedure before the board not shown in the record which, if proved, would
warrant reversal or remand, the Court of Appeals may refer the allegations to a
master appointed by the court to take evidence and make findings of fact upon
them.
Approved by the Governor May
3, 1999
Filed in the office of
Secretary of State May 3, 1999
Effective date October 23,
1999
__________