Chapter 945 Oregon Laws 1999
Session Law
AN ACT
HB 3395
Relating to evidence;
creating new provisions; and amending ORS 40.460.
Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1.
ORS 40.460 is amended to read:
40.460. The following are not excluded by ORS 40.455, even
though the declarant is available as a witness:
(1) (Reserved.)
(2) A statement relating to a startling event or condition made
while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or
condition.
(3) A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind,
emotion, sensation or physical condition, such as intent, plan, motive, design,
mental feeling, pain or bodily health, but not including a statement of memory
or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the
execution, revocation, identification, or terms of the declarant's will.
(4) Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or
treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain or
sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause of external
source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.
(5) A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a
witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable the
witness to testify fully and accurately, shown to have been made or adopted by
the witness when the matter was fresh in the memory of the witness and to
reflect that knowledge correctly. If admitted, the memorandum or record may be
read into evidence but may not itself be received as an exhibit unless offered
by an adverse party.
(6) A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any
form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the
time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept
in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the
regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report,
record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or
other qualified witness, unless the source of information or the method of
circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness. The term
"business" as used in this subsection includes business, institution,
association, profession, occupation, and calling of every kind, whether or not
conducted for profit.
(7) Evidence that a matter is not included in the memoranda,
reports, records, or data compilations, and in any form, kept in accordance
with the provisions of subsection (6) of this section, to prove the
nonoccurrence or nonexistence of the matter, if the matter was of a kind of
which a memorandum, report, record, or data compilation was regularly made and
preserved, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate
lack of trustworthiness.
(8) Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any
form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth:
(a) The activities of the office or agency;
(b) Matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to
which matters there was a duty to report, excluding however, in criminal cases
matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel; or
(c) In civil actions and proceedings and against the government
in criminal cases, factual findings, resulting from an investigation made
pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or
other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.
(9) Records or data compilations, in any form, of births, fetal
deaths, deaths or marriages, if the report thereof was made to a public office
pursuant to requirements of law.
(10) To prove the absence of a record, report, statement, or
data compilation, in any form, or the nonoccurrence or nonexistence of a matter
of which a record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, was
regularly made and preserved by a public office or agency, evidence in the form
of a certification in accordance with ORS 40.510, or testimony, that diligent
search failed to disclose the record, report, statement, or data compilation,
or entry.
(11) Statements of births, marriages, divorces, deaths,
legitimacy, ancestry, relationship by blood or marriage, or other similar facts
of personal or family history, contained in a regularly kept record of a
religious organization.
(12) A statement of fact contained in a certificate that the
maker performed a marriage or other ceremony or administered a sacrament, made
by a clergyman, public official, or other person authorized by the rules or
practices of a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified,
and purporting to have been issued at the time of the act or within a
reasonable time thereafter.
(13) Statements of facts concerning personal or family history
contained in family bibles, genealogies, charts, engravings on rings,
inscriptions on family portraits, engravings on urns, crypts, or tombstones, or
the like.
(14) The record of a document purporting to establish or affect
an interest in property, as proof of content of the original recorded document
and its execution and delivery by each person by whom it purports to have been
executed, if the record is a record of a public office and an applicable
statute authorizes the recording of documents of that kind in that office.
(15) A statement contained in a document purporting to
establish or affect an interest in property if the matter stated was relevant
to the purpose of the document, unless dealings with the property since the
document was made have been inconsistent with the truth of the statement or the
purport of the document.
(16) Statements in a document in existence 20 years or more the
authenticity of which is established.
(17) Market quotations, tabulations, lists, directories, or
other published compilations, generally used and relied upon by the public or
by persons in particular occupations.
(18) (Reserved.)
(18a)(a) A complaint of sexual misconduct or complaint of abuse
as defined in ORS 107.705 or
419B.005 made by the witness after the commission of the alleged misconduct or
abuse at issue. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, such
evidence must be confined to the fact that the complaint was made.
(b) A statement made by [a
child victim or person with developmental disabilities as described in
paragraph (d) of this subsection] a
person[, which statement concerns] concerning an act of abuse, as defined
in ORS 107.705 or 419B.005, [or sexual conduct performed with or on the
child or person with developmental disabilities by another,] is not
excluded by ORS 40.455 if the [child or
person with developmental disabilities]
declarant either testifies at the proceeding and is subject to
cross-examination or [is] was chronologically or mentally under
12 years of age at the time the
statement was made and is unavailable as a witness. However, [when a witness under 12 years of age or a
person with developmental disabilities]
if a declarant is unavailable [as a
witness], the statement may be admitted in evidence only if the proponent
establishes that the time, content and circumstances of the statement provide
indicia of reliability, and in a criminal trial that there is corroborative
evidence of the act of abuse [or sexual
conduct] and of the alleged perpetrator's opportunity to participate in the
conduct and that the statement possesses indicia of reliability as is
constitutionally required to be admitted. No statement may be admitted under
this paragraph unless the proponent of the statement makes known to the adverse
party the proponent's intention to offer the statement and the particulars of
the statement no later than 15 days before trial, except for good cause shown.
For purposes of this paragraph, in addition to those situations described in
ORS 40.465 (1), the [child or person with
developmental disabilities]
declarant shall be considered "unavailable" if the [child or person with developmental
disabilities] declarant has a
substantial lack of memory of the subject matter of the statement, is presently
incompetent to testify, is unable to communicate about the abuse or sexual
conduct because of fear or other similar reason or is substantially likely, as
established by expert testimony, to suffer lasting severe emotional trauma from
testifying. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the court shall examine the
[child or person with developmental
disabilities] declarant in
chambers and on the record or outside the presence of the jury and on the
record. The examination shall be conducted immediately prior to the
commencement of the trial in the presence of the attorney and the legal
guardian or other suitable adult as designated by the court. If the [child or person with developmental
disabilities] declarant is found
to be unavailable, the court shall then determine the admissibility of the
evidence. The determinations shall be appealable under ORS 138.060 (3). The
purpose of the examination shall be to aid the court in making its findings
regarding the availability of the [child
or person with developmental disabilities] declarant as a witness and the reliability of the statement of the
[child or person with developmental
disabilities] declarant. In
determining whether a statement possesses indicia of reliability under this
paragraph, the court may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors:
(A) The personal knowledge of the [child or person with developmental disabilities] declarant of the event;
(B) The age and maturity of the [child] declarant or
extent of disability [of the person with] if the declarant is a person with
developmental disabilities;
(C) Certainty that the statement was made, including the
credibility of the person testifying about the statement and any motive the
person may have to falsify or distort the statement;
(D) Any apparent motive the [child or person with developmental disabilities] declarant may have to falsify or
distort the event, including bias, corruption or coercion;
(E) The timing of the statement of the [child or person with developmental disabilities] declarant;
(F) Whether more than one person heard the statement;
(G) Whether the [child or
person with developmental disabilities]
declarant was suffering pain or distress when making the statement;
(H) Whether the [child's] declarant's young age or disability makes it unlikely that
the [child] declarant fabricated a statement that represents a graphic,
detailed account beyond the [child's]
knowledge and experience of the
declarant;
(I) Whether the statement has internal consistency or coherence
and uses terminology appropriate to the [child's] declarant's age or to the extent of
the declarant's disability [of the] if the declarant is a person with developmental disabilities;
(J) Whether the statement is spontaneous or directly responsive
to questions; and
(K) Whether the statement was elicited by leading questions.
(c) This subsection applies to all civil, criminal and juvenile
proceedings.
(d) This subsection
applies to a child declarant or an adult declarant with developmental
disabilities. For the purposes of this subsection, "developmental
disabilities" means any disability attributable to mental retardation,
autism, cerebral palsy, epilepsy or other disabling neurological condition that
requires training or support similar to that required by persons with mental
retardation, if either of the following apply:
(A) The disability originates before the person attains 22
years of age, or if the disability is attributable to mental retardation the
condition is manifested before the person attains 18 years of age, the
disability can be expected to continue indefinitely, and the disability
constitutes a substantial handicap to the ability of the person to function in
society.
(B) The disability results in a significant subaverage general
intellectual functioning with concurrent deficits in adaptive behavior that are
manifested during the developmental period.
(19) Reputation among members of a person's family by blood,
adoption or marriage, or among a person's associates, or in the community,
concerning a person's birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, death, legitimacy,
relationship by blood or adoption or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact
of a person's personal or family history.
(20) Reputation in a community, arising before the controversy,
as to boundaries of or customs affecting lands in the community, and reputation
as to events of general history important to the community or state or nation
in which located.
(21) Reputation of a person's character among associates of the
person or in the community.
(22) Evidence of a final judgment, entered after a trial or
upon a plea of guilty, but not upon a plea of no contest, adjudging a person
guilty of a crime other than a traffic offense, to prove any fact essential to
sustain the judgment, but not including, when offered by the government in a
criminal prosecution for purposes other than impeachment, judgments against
persons other than the accused. The pendency of an appeal may be shown but does
not affect admissibility.
(23) Judgments as proof of matters of personal, family or
general history, or boundaries, essential to the judgment, if the same would be
provable by evidence of reputation.
(24) Notwithstanding the limits contained in subsection (18a)
of this section, in any proceeding in which a child under 12 years of age at
the time of trial, or a person with developmental disabilities as described in
subsection (18)(d) of this section, may be called as a witness to testify
concerning an act of abuse, as defined in ORS 419B.005, or sexual conduct
performed with or on the child or person with developmental disabilities by
another, the testimony of the child or person with developmental disabilities
taken by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place
under the supervision of the trial judge and communicated to the courtroom by
closed circuit television or other audiovisual means. Testimony will be allowed
as provided in this subsection only if the court finds that there is a
substantial likelihood, established by expert testimony, that the child or
person with developmental disabilities will suffer severe emotional or
psychological harm if required to testify in open court. If the court makes
such a finding, the court, on motion of a party, the child, the person with
developmental disabilities or the court in a civil proceeding, or on motion of
the district attorney, the child or the person with developmental disabilities
in a criminal or juvenile proceeding, may order that the testimony of the child
or the person with developmental disabilities be taken as described in this
subsection. Only the judge, the attorneys for the parties, the parties,
individuals necessary to operate the equipment and any individual the court
finds would contribute to the welfare and well-being of the child or person
with developmental disabilities may be present during the testimony of the
child or person with developmental disabilities.
(25) Any document containing data prepared or recorded by the
Oregon State Police pursuant to ORS 813.160 (1)(b)(C) or (E), or pursuant to
ORS 475.235 (3), if the document is produced by data retrieval from the Law
Enforcement Data System or other computer system maintained and operated by the
Oregon State Police, and the person retrieving the data attests that the
information was retrieved directly from the system and that the document
accurately reflects the data retrieved.
(26)(a) A statement that
purports to narrate, describe, report or explain an incident of domestic
violence, as defined in ORS 135.230, made by a victim of the domestic violence
within 24 hours after the incident occurred, if the statement:
(A) Was recorded, either
electronically or in writing, or was made to a peace officer as defined in ORS
161.015, corrections officer, youth corrections officer, parole and probation
officer, emergency medical technician or firefighter; and
(B) Has sufficient indicia
of reliability.
(b) In determining whether a
statement has sufficient indicia of reliability under paragraph (a) of this
subsection, the court shall consider all circumstances surrounding the
statement. The court may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors
in determining whether a statement has sufficient indicia of reliability:
(A) The personal knowledge
of the declarant.
(B) Whether the statement is
corroborated by evidence other than statements that are subject to admission
only pursuant to this subsection.
(C) The timing of the
statement.
(D) Whether the statement
was elicited by leading questions.
(E) Subsequent statements
made by the declarant. Recantation by a declarant is not sufficient reason for
denying admission of a statement under this subsection in the absence of other
factors indicating unreliability.
[(26)(a)] (27)(a) A statement not specifically
covered by any of the foregoing exceptions but having equivalent circumstantial
guarantees of trustworthiness, if the court determines that:
(A) The statement is relevant;
(B) The statement is more probative on the point for which it
is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through
reasonable efforts; and
(C) The general purposes of the Oregon Evidence Code and the
interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into
evidence.
(b) A statement may not be admitted under this subsection
unless the proponent of it makes known to the adverse party the intention to
offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address
of the declarant, sufficiently in advance of the trial or hearing, or as soon
as practicable after it becomes apparent that such statement is probative of
the issues at hand, to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to
prepare to meet it.
SECTION 2. The amendments to ORS 40.460 by section 1
of this 1999 Act apply only to trials commenced on or after the effective date
of this 1999 Act.
Approved by the Governor
August 16, 1999
Filed in the office of
Secretary of State August 16, 1999
Effective date October 23,
1999
__________