Chapter 1055 Oregon Laws 1999

Session Law

 

AN ACT

 

SB 392

 

Relating to death penalty; creating new provisions; amending ORS 40.015, 137.463, 137.707, 138.510, 138.590, 144.122, 144.126 and 163.150; and repealing ORS 138.685 and 138.687.

 

Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:

 

      SECTION 1. ORS 163.150 is amended to read:

      163.150. (1)(a) Upon a finding that the defendant is guilty of aggravated murder, the court, except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, shall conduct a separate sentencing proceeding to determine whether the defendant shall be sentenced to life imprisonment, as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(c), life imprisonment without the possibility of release or parole, as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(b), or death. The proceeding shall be conducted in the trial court before the trial jury as soon as practicable. If a juror for any reason is unable to perform the function of a juror, the juror shall be dismissed from the sentencing proceeding. The court shall cause to be drawn the name of one of the alternate jurors, who shall then become a member of the jury for the sentencing proceeding notwithstanding the fact that the alternate juror did not deliberate on the issue of guilt. The substitution of an alternate juror shall be allowed only if the jury has not begun to deliberate on the issue of the sentence. If the defendant has pleaded guilty, the sentencing proceeding shall be conducted before a jury impaneled for that purpose. In the proceeding, evidence may be presented as to any matter that the court deems relevant to sentence including, but not limited to, victim impact evidence relating to the personal characteristics of the victim or the impact of the crime on the victim's family and any aggravating or mitigating evidence relevant to the issue in paragraph (b)(D) of this subsection; however, neither the state nor the defendant shall be allowed to introduce repetitive evidence that has previously been offered and received during the trial on the issue of guilt. The court shall instruct the jury that all evidence previously offered and received may be considered for purposes of the sentencing hearing. This subsection shall not be construed to authorize the introduction of any evidence secured in violation of the Constitution of the United States or of the State of Oregon. The state and the defendant or the counsel of the defendant shall be permitted to present arguments for or against a sentence of death and for or against a sentence of life imprisonment with or without the possibility of release or parole.

      (b) Upon the conclusion of the presentation of the evidence, the court shall submit the following issues to the jury:

      (A) Whether the conduct of the defendant that caused the death of the deceased was committed deliberately and with the reasonable expectation that death of the deceased or another would result;

      (B) Whether there is a probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society;

      (C) If raised by the evidence, whether the conduct of the defendant in killing the deceased was unreasonable in response to the provocation, if any, by the deceased; and

      (D) Whether the defendant should receive a death sentence.

      (c)(A) The court shall instruct the jury to consider, in determining the issues in paragraph (b) of this subsection, any mitigating circumstances offered in evidence, including but not limited to the defendant's age, the extent and severity of the defendant's prior criminal conduct and the extent of the mental and emotional pressure under which the defendant was acting at the time the offense was committed.

      (B) The court shall instruct the jury to answer the question in paragraph (b)(D) of this subsection "no" if, after considering any aggravating evidence and any mitigating evidence concerning any aspect of the defendant's character or background, or any circumstances of the offense and any victim impact evidence as described in subsection (1)(a) of this section, one or more of the jurors believe that the defendant should not receive a death sentence.

      (d) The state must prove each issue submitted under paragraph (b)(A) to (C) of this subsection beyond a reasonable doubt, and the jury shall return a special verdict of "yes" or "no" on each issue considered.

      (e) The court shall charge the jury that it may not answer any issue "yes," under paragraph (b) of this subsection unless it agrees unanimously.

      (f) If the jury returns an affirmative finding on each issue considered under paragraph (b) of this subsection, the trial judge shall sentence the defendant to death.

      [(g) The judgment of conviction and sentence of death shall be subject to automatic and direct review by the Supreme Court. The review by the Supreme Court shall have priority over all other cases, and shall be heard in accordance with rules promulgated by the Supreme Court. A sentence of death shall be automatically stayed if the defendant seeks review by the United States Supreme Court on a direct appeal. The stay shall remain in effect until:]

      [(A) The defendant's time for filing a petition for certiorari or an appeal expires;]

      [(B) The United States Supreme Court acts to decline to consider the case further; or]

      [(C) The United States Supreme Court resolves the case on the merits.]

      (2)(a) Upon the conclusion of the presentation of the evidence, the court shall also instruct the jury that if it reaches a negative finding on any issue under subsection (1)(b) of this section, the trial court shall sentence the defendant to life imprisonment without the possibility of release or parole, as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(b), unless 10 or more members of the jury further find that there are sufficient mitigating circumstances to warrant life imprisonment, in which case the trial court shall sentence the defendant to life imprisonment as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(c).

      (b) If the jury returns a negative finding on any issue under subsection (1)(b) of this section and further finds that there are sufficient mitigating circumstances to warrant life imprisonment, the trial court shall sentence the defendant to life imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(c).

      (3)(a) When the defendant is found guilty of aggravated murder [upon a plea of guilty or no contest prior to the introduction of evidence before the trier of fact], and the state advises the court on the record that the state declines to present evidence for purposes of sentencing the defendant to death, the court:

      (A) Shall not conduct a sentencing proceeding as described in subsection (1) of this section, and a sentence of death shall not be ordered.

      (B) Shall conduct a sentencing proceeding to determine whether the defendant shall be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of release or parole as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(b) or life imprisonment as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(c). If the defendant waives all rights to a jury sentencing proceeding, the court shall conduct the sentencing proceeding as the trier of fact. The procedure for the sentencing proceeding, whether before a court or a jury, shall follow the procedure of subsection (1)(a) and subsection (2) of this section, as modified by this subsection which prohibits a sentence of death when the state declines to present evidence.

      (b) Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the court from sentencing the defendant to life imprisonment, as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(c), or life imprisonment without the possibility of release or parole, as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(b), pursuant to a stipulation of sentence or stipulation of sentencing facts agreed to and offered by both parties if the defendant waives all rights to a jury sentencing proceeding.

      (4) If any part of subsection (2) of this section is held invalid and as a result thereof a defendant who has been sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of release or parole will instead be sentenced to life imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in ORS 163.105 (2), the defendant shall be confined for a minimum of 30 years without possibility of parole, release on work release or any form of temporary leave or employment at a forest or work camp. Subsection (2) of this section shall apply only to trials commencing on or after July 19, 1989.

      (5) Notwithstanding subsection (1)(a) of this section, [the following shall apply:]

      [(a) If a reviewing court finds prejudicial error in the sentencing proceeding only, the court may set aside the sentence of death and remand the case to the trial court. No error in the sentencing proceeding shall result in reversal of the defendant's conviction for aggravated murder. Upon remand and at the election of the state, the trial court shall either:]

      [(A) Sentence the defendant to imprisonment for life in the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(c); or]

      [(B) Impanel a new sentencing jury for the purpose of conducting a new sentencing proceeding to determine if the defendant should be sentenced to:]

      [(i) Death;]

      [(ii) Imprisonment for life without the possibility of release or parole as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(b); or]

      [(iii) Imprisonment for life in the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(c).]

      [(b)] if the trial court grants a mistrial during the sentencing proceeding, the trial court, at the election of the state, shall either:

      [(A)] (a) Sentence the defendant to imprisonment for life in the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(c); or

      [(B)] (b) Impanel a new sentencing jury for the purpose of conducting a new sentencing proceeding to determine if the defendant should be sentenced to:

      [(i)] (A) Death;

      [(ii)] (B) Imprisonment for life without the possibility of release or parole as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(b); or

      [(iii)] (C) Imprisonment for life in the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(c).

      [(c) Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the court from sentencing the defendant to life imprisonment without the possibility of release or parole, as described in ORS 163.105 (1)(b), pursuant to a stipulation of sentence if the defendant waives all rights to a jury sentencing proceeding.]

      [(d) The new sentencing proceeding shall be governed by the provisions of subsections (1) and (2) of this section. A transcript of all testimony and all exhibits and other evidence properly admitted in the prior trial and sentencing proceeding shall be admissible in the new sentencing proceeding. Either party may recall any witness who testified at the prior trial or sentencing proceeding and may present additional relevant evidence.]

      [(e) The provisions of this section are procedural and shall apply to any defendant sentenced to death after December 6, 1984.]

      SECTION 2. ORS 137.463 is amended to read:

      137.463. (1) When a [judgment] sentence of death is pronounced, [a warrant signed by the trial judge and attested by the clerk of the court, with the seal of the court affixed, shall be drawn and delivered] the clerk of the court shall deliver a copy of the judgment of conviction and sentence of death to the sheriff of the county. [The warrant shall state the conviction and judgment and shall direct] The sheriff [to] shall deliver the defendant within 20 days from the [time of] date the judgment [to the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary] is entered to the correctional institution designated by the Director of the Department of Corrections pending the determination of the automatic and direct review by the Supreme Court under section 5 of this 1999 Act.

      (2) If the Supreme Court affirms the sentence of death, a death warrant[, signed by the trial judge of the court in which the judgment was rendered and attested by the clerk of that court, shall be drawn and delivered to the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary. The warrant shall appoint a day on which the judgment is to be executed and shall authorize and command the superintendent to execute the judgment of the court.] hearing shall take place in the court in which the judgment was rendered within 30 days after the effective date of the appellate judgment or, upon motion of the state, on a later date. The following apply to a death warrant hearing under this subsection:

      (a) The defendant must be present; and

      (b) The defendant may be represented by counsel. If the defendant was represented by appointed counsel on automatic and direct review, that counsel's appointment continues for purposes of the death warrant hearing and any related matters. If that counsel is unavailable, the court shall appoint counsel pursuant to the procedure in ORS 135.050 and 135.055.

      (3)(a) If the defendant indicates the wish to waive the right to counsel for the purpose of the death warrant hearing, the court shall inquire of the defendant on the record to ensure that the waiver is competent, knowing and voluntary.

      (b) If the court finds that the waiver is competent, knowing and voluntary, the court shall discharge counsel.

      (c) If the court finds on the record that the waiver of the right to counsel granted by this section is not competent, knowing or voluntary, the court shall continue the appointment of counsel.

      (d) Notwithstanding the fact that the court finds on the record that the defendant competently, knowingly and voluntarily waives the right to counsel, the court may continue the appointment of counsel as advisor only for the purposes of the death warrant hearing.

      (4) At the death warrant hearing, the court:

      (a) After appropriate inquiry, shall make findings on the record whether the defendant suffers from a mental condition that prevents the defendant from comprehending the reasons for the death sentence or its implication. The defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant suffers from a mental condition that prevents the defendant from comprehending the reasons for the death sentence or its implication.

      (b) Shall advise the defendant that the defendant is entitled to counsel in any post-conviction proceeding and that counsel will be appointed if the defendant is indigent.

      (c) Shall determine whether the defendant intends to pursue any challenges to the sentence or conviction. If the defendant states on the record that the defendant does not intend to challenge the sentence or conviction, the court after advising the defendant of the consequences shall make a finding on the record whether the defendant competently, knowingly and voluntarily waives the right to pursue:

      (A) A petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court;

      (B) Post-conviction relief under ORS 138.510 to 138.680; and

      (C) Federal habeas corpus review under 28 U.S.C. 2254.

      (5) Following the death warrant hearing, a death warrant, signed by the trial judge of the court in which the judgment was rendered and attested by the clerk of that court, shall be drawn and delivered to the superintendent of the correctional institution designated by the Director of the Department of Corrections. The death warrant shall specify a day on which the sentence of death is to be executed and shall authorize and command the superintendent to execute the judgment of the court. The trial court shall specify the date of execution of the sentence, taking into consideration the needs of the Department of Corrections. The trial court shall specify a date not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days following the effective date of the appellate judgment.

      (6)(a) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section, if the court finds that the defendant suffers from a mental condition that prevents the defendant from comprehending the reasons for the sentence of death or its implications, the court may not issue a death warrant until such time as the court, after appropriate inquiries, finds that the defendant is able to comprehend the reasons for the sentence of death and its implications.

      (b)(A) If the court does not issue a death warrant because it finds that the defendant suffers from a mental condition that prevents the defendant from comprehending the reasons for the sentence of death or its implications, the court shall conduct subsequent hearings on the issue on motion of the district attorney or the defendant's counsel or on the court's own motion, upon a showing that there is substantial reason to believe that the defendant's condition has changed.

      (B) The court may hold a hearing under this paragraph no more frequently than once every six months.

      (C) The state and the defendant may obtain an independent medical, psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant in connection with a hearing under this paragraph.

      (D) In a hearing under this paragraph, the defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant continues to suffer from a mental condition that prevents the defendant from comprehending the reasons for the sentence of death or its implications.

      (7) If for any reason a sentence of death is not executed on the date appointed in the death warrant, and the sentence of death remains in force and is not stayed under section 6 of this 1999 Act or otherwise by a court of competent jurisdiction, the court that issued the initial death warrant, on motion of the state and without further hearing, shall issue a new death warrant specifying a new date on which the sentence is to be executed. The court shall specify a date for execution of the sentence, taking into consideration the needs of the Department of Corrections. The court shall specify a date not more than 20 days after the date on which the state's motion was filed.

      (8) No appeal may be taken from an order issued pursuant to this section.

      SECTION 3. (1)(a) At the death warrant hearing under ORS 137.463, the court shall order that the Mental Health and Developmental Disability Services Division or its designee perform an assessment of the defendant's mental capacity to engage in reasoned choices of legal strategies and options if:

      (A) The defendant indicates the wish to waive the right to counsel; and

      (B) The court has substantial reason to believe that, due to mental incapacity, the defendant cannot engage in reasoned choices of legal strategies and options.

      (b) The court also shall order an assessment described in paragraph (a) of this subsection upon motion by the state.

      (2) If the requirements of subsection (1) of this section are met, the court may order the defendant to be committed to a state mental hospital designated by the Mental Health and Developmental Disability Services Division for a period not exceeding 30 days for the purpose of assessing the defendant's mental capacity. The report of any competency assessment performed under this section must include, but need not be limited to, the following:

      (a) A description of the nature of the assessment;

      (b) A statement of the mental condition of the defendant; and

      (c) A statement regarding the defendant's mental capacity to engage in reasoned choices of legal strategies and options.

      (3) If the competency assessment cannot be conducted because the defendant is unwilling to participate, the report must so state and must include, if possible, an opinion as to whether the unwillingness of the defendant is the result of a mental condition affecting the defendant's mental capacity to engage in reasoned choices of legal strategies and options.

      (4) The Mental Health and Developmental Disability Services Division shall file three copies of the report of the competency assessment with the clerk of the court, who shall cause copies to be delivered to the district attorney and to counsel for the defendant.

      SECTION 4. (1) If the court has ordered the Mental Health and Developmental Disability Services Division to perform a competency assessment of the defendant under section 3 of this 1999 Act and the assessment has been completed, the court shall determine the issue of the defendant's mental capacity to engage in reasoned choices of legal strategies and options. If neither the state nor counsel for the defendant contests the finding of the report filed under section 3 of this 1999 Act, the court may make the determination of the defendant's mental capacity to engage in reasoned choices of legal strategies and options on the basis of the report. If the finding is contested, the court shall hold a hearing on the issue. If the report is received in evidence at the hearing, the party contesting the finding has the right to summon and to cross-examine the psychiatrist or psychologist who submitted the report and to offer evidence on the issue. Either party may introduce other evidence regarding the defendant's mental capacity to engage in reasoned choices of legal strategies and options.

      (2) If the court determines that, due to mental incapacity, the defendant cannot engage in reasoned choices of legal strategies and options, the court shall continue the appointment of counsel provided under ORS 137.463.

      (3) No appeal may be taken from an order issued pursuant to this section.

      SECTION 5. (1) The judgment of conviction and sentence of death entered under ORS 163.150 (1)(f) is subject to automatic and direct review by the Supreme Court. The review by the Supreme Court has priority over all other cases and shall be heard in accordance with rules adopted by the Supreme Court.

      (2) Notwithstanding ORS 163.150 (1)(a), after automatic and direct review of a conviction and sentence of death the following apply:

      (a) If a reviewing court finds prejudicial error in the sentencing proceeding only, the court may set aside the sentence of death and remand the case to the trial court. No error in the sentencing proceeding results in reversal of the defendant's conviction for aggravated murder. Upon remand and at the election of the state, the trial court shall either:

      (A) Sentence the defendant to imprisonment for life in the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(c); or

      (B) Impanel a new sentencing jury for the purpose of conducting a new sentencing proceeding to determine if the defendant should be sentenced to:

      (i) Death;

      (ii) Imprisonment for life without the possibility of release or parole as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(b); or

      (iii) Imprisonment for life in the custody of the Department of Corrections as provided in ORS 163.105 (1)(c).

      (b) The new sentencing proceeding is governed by the provisions of ORS 163.150 (1), (2), (3)(b) and (5). A transcript of all testimony and all exhibits and other evidence properly admitted in the prior trial and sentencing proceeding are admissible in the new sentencing proceeding. Either party may recall any witness who testified at the prior trial or sentencing proceeding and may present additional relevant evidence.

      (c) The provisions of this subsection are procedural and apply to any defendant sentenced to death after December 6, 1984.

      SECTION 6. (1) The execution of a sentence of death is automatically stayed for 90 days following the effective date of an appellate judgment affirming the sentence of death on automatic and direct review.

      (2) If the defendant files a petition for certiorari seeking United States Supreme Court review of the sentence of death within 90 days after the effective date of the appellate judgment or within such other time as allowed by the United States Supreme Court, execution of the sentence of death is automatically stayed until the United States Supreme Court denies the petition or grants the petition and resolves the merits.

      (3) Upon final resolution of a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, execution of the sentence of death is automatically stayed for 30 days after the date the petition is resolved to allow the defendant to file a notice in the circuit court of the county in which the defendant is imprisoned attesting to the defendant's intent to file a petition for post-conviction relief. If the defendant files a first petition for post-conviction relief within 90 days after the notice provided for in this subsection, the execution of the sentence of death is stayed until the post-conviction petition is finally resolved. If a first petition for post-conviction relief is not filed within 90 days after the notice provided for in this subsection, the defendant may apply to the circuit court in which the notice was filed to extend the stay. The circuit court shall extend the stay for a reasonable time upon the defendant's showing that progress is being made in the preparation of the petition and that it will be filed within a reasonable time.

      (4) If the defendant does not file a petition for certiorari seeking United States Supreme Court review of the sentence of death but does file a first petition for post-conviction relief within 90 days after the date upon which the appellate judgment becomes effective, execution of the sentence of death is stayed until the petition for post-conviction relief is finally resolved.

      SECTION 7. ORS 138.510 is amended to read:

      138.510. (1) Except as otherwise provided in ORS 138.540, any person convicted of a crime under the laws of this state may file a petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680.

      (2) A petition for post-conviction relief may be filed by one person on behalf of another person who has been convicted of aggravated murder and sentenced to death only if the person filing the petition demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that:

      (a) The person sentenced to death is unable to file a petition on the person's own behalf due to mental incapacity or because of a lack of access to the court; and

      (b) The person filing the petition has a significant relationship with the person sentenced to death and will act in the best interest of the person on whose behalf the petition is being filed.

      [(2)] (3) A petition pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680 must be filed within two years of the following, unless the court on hearing a subsequent petition finds grounds for relief asserted which could not reasonably have been raised in the original or amended petition:

      (a) If no appeal is taken, the date the judgment or order on the conviction was entered in the register.

      (b) If an appeal is taken, the date the appeal is final in the Oregon appellate courts.

      [(3)] (4) A one-year filing period shall apply retroactively to petitions filed by persons whose convictions and appeals became final before August 5, 1989, and any such petitions must be filed within one year after November 4, 1993. A person whose post-conviction petition was dismissed prior to November 4, 1993, cannot file another post-conviction petition involving the same case.

      [(4)] (5) The remedy created by ORS 138.510 to 138.680 is available to persons convicted before May 26, 1959.

      [(5)] (6) In any post-conviction proceeding pending in the courts of this state on May 26, 1959, the person seeking relief in such proceedings shall be allowed to amend the action and seek relief under ORS 138.510 to 138.680. If such person does not choose to amend the action in this manner, the law existing prior to May 26, 1959, shall govern the case.

      SECTION 8. ORS 138.590 is amended to read:

      138.590. (1) Any petitioner who is unable to pay the expenses of a proceeding pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680 or to employ suitable counsel possessing skills and experience commensurate with the nature of the conviction and complexity of the case for such a proceeding may proceed as an indigent person pursuant to this section upon order of the circuit court in which the petition is filed.

      (2) If the petitioner wishes to proceed as an indigent person, the person shall file with the petition an affidavit stating inability to pay the expenses of a proceeding pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680, including, but not limited to, the filing fee required by ORS 138.560, or to employ suitable counsel for such a proceeding. The affidavit shall contain a brief statement of the petitioner's assets and liabilities and income during the previous year. If the circuit court is satisfied that the petitioner is unable to pay such expenses or to employ suitable counsel, it shall order that the petitioner proceed as an indigent person. If the court finds that a petitioner who has been sentenced to death is not competent to decide whether to accept or reject the appointment of counsel, the court shall appoint counsel to represent the petitioner. However, when the Circuit Court for Marion County orders petitioner's case transferred to another circuit court as provided in ORS 138.560 (4), the matter of petitioner's proceeding as an indigent person shall be determined by the latter court.

      (3) If a petitioner who has been sentenced to death qualifies for the appointment of counsel under this section but rejects the appointment, the court shall determine, after a hearing if necessary, whether the petitioner rejected the offer of counsel and made the decision with an understanding of its legal consequences. The court shall make appropriate findings on the record.

      [(3)] (4) In the order to proceed as an indigent person, the circuit court shall appoint suitable counsel to represent petitioner. Counsel so appointed shall represent petitioner throughout the proceedings in the circuit court.

      [(4)] (5) If counsel appointed by the circuit court determines that the petition as filed by petitioner is defective, either in form or in substance, or both, counsel may move to amend the petition within 15 days following counsel's appointment, or within such further period as the court may allow. Such amendment shall be permitted as of right at any time during this period. If appointed counsel believes that the original petition cannot be construed to state a ground for relief under ORS 138.510 to 138.680, and cannot be amended to state such a ground, counsel shall, in lieu of moving to amend the petition, inform the petitioner and notify the circuit court of such belief by filing an affidavit stating such belief and the reasons therefor with the clerk of the circuit court. This affidavit shall not constitute a ground for denying the petition prior to a hearing upon its sufficiency, but the circuit court may consider such affidavit in deciding upon the sufficiency of the petition at the hearing.

      [(5)] (6) When a petitioner has been ordered to proceed as an indigent person, the expenses which are necessary for the proceedings upon the petition in the circuit court and the compensation to appointed counsel for petitioner as provided in this subsection shall be paid by the state from funds available for the purpose. At the conclusion of proceedings on a petition pursuant to ORS 138.510 to 138.680, the circuit court shall determine and allow, as provided in ORS 135.055, the amount of expenses of petitioner and compensation for the services of appointed counsel in the proceedings in the circuit court. The expenses and compensation determined by the circuit court shall be certified to and paid by the state.

      [(6)] (7) If appointed counsel is under contract to provide services for the proceeding pursuant to ORS 151.460, the court shall not allow compensation for that appointed counsel. In all other cases, counsel shall be compensated as provided in this section.

      [(7)(a)] (8)(a) When a petitioner has been ordered to proceed as an indigent person, all court fees in the circuit court, except for the filing fee required by ORS 138.560, are waived.

      (b) When a petitioner is allowed to file a petition without payment of the fee required by ORS 138.560 due to inability to pay, the fee is not waived but may be drawn from, or charged against, the petitioner's trust account if the petitioner is an inmate in a correctional facility.

      (9) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a court may not appoint as counsel for a petitioner who has been sentenced to death a counsel who previously represented the petitioner at trial or on automatic and direct review in the case resulting in the death sentence unless the petitioner and the counsel expressly request continued representation.

      SECTION 9. (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a licensed health care professional or a nonlicensed medically trained person may assist the Department of Corrections in an execution carried out under ORS 137.473.

      (2) Any assistance rendered in an execution carried out under ORS 137.473 by a licensed health care professional or a nonlicensed medically trained person is not cause for disciplinary measures or regulatory oversight by any board, commission or agency created by this state or governed by state law that oversees or regulates the practice of health care professionals including, but not limited to, the Board of Medical Examiners for the State of Oregon and the Oregon State Board of Nursing.

      (3) The infliction of the punishment of death by the administration of the required lethal substances in the manner required by ORS 137.473 may not be construed to be the practice of medicine.

      (4) As used in this section, "licensed health care professional" includes, but is not limited to, a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, nurse and emergency medical technician licensed by the Board of Medical Examiners of the State of Oregon or the Oregon State Board of Nursing.

      SECTION 10. Not later than 30 days after the execution of a sentence of death under ORS 137.473, the superintendent of the correctional institution where the sentence was executed shall return the death warrant to the clerk of the trial court from which the warrant was issued with the superintendent's return on the death warrant showing the time, place and manner in which the death warrant was executed.

      SECTION 11. ORS 40.015 is amended to read:

      40.015. (1) The Oregon Evidence Code applies to all courts in this state except for:

      (a) A tax court small claims procedure or a hearing or mediation before a magistrate of the Oregon Tax Court as provided by ORS 305.501;

      (b) The small claims department of a circuit court as provided by ORS 46.415; and

      (c) The small claims department of a justice court as provided by ORS 55.080.

      (2) The Oregon Evidence Code applies generally to civil actions, suits and proceedings, criminal actions and proceedings and to contempt proceedings except those in which the court may act summarily.

      (3) ORS 40.225 to 40.295 relating to privileges apply at all stages of all actions, suits and proceedings.

      (4) ORS 40.010 to 40.210 and 40.310 to 40.585 do not apply in the following situations:

      (a) The determination of questions of fact preliminary to admissibility of evidence when the issue is to be determined by the court under ORS 40.030.

      (b) Proceedings before grand juries, except as required by ORS 132.320.

      (c) Proceedings for extradition, except as required by ORS 133.743 to 133.857.

      (d) Sentencing proceedings, except proceedings under ORS 163.150 and section 5 of this 1999 Act or as required by ORS 137.090.

      (e) Proceedings to revoke probation, except as required by ORS 137.090.

      (f) Issuance of warrants of arrest, bench warrants or search warrants.

      (g) Proceedings under ORS chapter 135 relating to conditional release, security release, release on personal recognizance, or preliminary hearings, subject to ORS 135.173.

      (h) Proceedings to determine proper disposition of a child in accordance with ORS 419B.325 (2) and 419C.400 (3).

      (i) Proceedings under ORS 813.210, 813.215, 813.220, 813.230, 813.250 and 813.255 to determine whether a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement should be allowed or terminated.

      SECTION 12. ORS 137.707 is amended to read:

      137.707. (1)(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a person charged with aggravated murder, as defined in ORS 163.095, or an offense listed in subsection (4)(a) of this section is 15, 16 or 17 years of age at the time the offense is committed, and the offense is committed on or after April 1, 1995, or when a person charged with an offense listed in subsection (4)(b) of this section is 15, 16 or 17 years of age at the time the offense is committed, and the offense is committed on or after October 4, 1997, the person shall be prosecuted as an adult in criminal court.

      (b) A district attorney, the Attorney General or a juvenile department counselor may not file in juvenile court a petition alleging that a person has committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute aggravated murder or an offense listed in subsection (4) of this section if the person was 15, 16 or 17 years of age at the time the act was committed.

      (2) When a person charged under this section is convicted of an offense listed in subsection (4) of this section, the court shall impose at least the presumptive term of imprisonment provided for the offense in subsection (4) of this section. The court may impose a greater presumptive term if otherwise permitted by law, but may not impose a lesser term. The person is not, during the service of the term of imprisonment, eligible for release on post-prison supervision or any form of temporary leave from custody. The person is not eligible for any reduction in, or based on, the minimum sentence for any reason under ORS 421.121 or any other provision of law. ORS 163.105 and 163.150 and section 5 of this 1999 Act apply to sentencing a person prosecuted under this section and convicted of aggravated murder under ORS 163.095 except that a person who was under 18 years of age at the time the offense was committed is not subject to a sentence of death.

      (3) The court shall commit the person to the legal and physical custody of the Department of Corrections.

      (4) The offenses to which this section applies and the presumptive sentences are:

___________________________________________________________________

 

      (a)(A)       Murder, as defined in

                           ORS 163.115................................................... 300 months

      (B)           Attempt or conspiracy

                           to commit aggravated

                           murder, as defined

                           in ORS 163.095............................................... 120 months

      (C)           Attempt or conspiracy

                           to commit murder, as

                           defined in ORS

                           163.115.............................................................. 90 months

      (D)           Manslaughter in the

                           first degree, as defined

                           in ORS 163.118............................................... 120 months

      (E)            Manslaughter in the

                           second degree, as defined

                           in ORS 163.125................................................. 75 months

      (F)            Assault in the

                       first degree, as defined

                       in ORS 163.185...................................................... 90 months

      (G)           Assault in the

                       second degree, as

                       defined in

                       ORS 163.175.......................................................... 70 months

      (H)           Kidnapping in the first

                       degree, as defined in

                       ORS 163.235.......................................................... 90 months

      (I)             Kidnapping in the second

                       degree, as defined in

                       ORS 163.225.......................................................... 70 months

      (J)             Rape in the first degree,

                           as defined in ORS

                           163.375............................................................ 100 months

      (K)           Rape in the second

                       degree, as defined in

                       ORS 163.365.......................................................... 75 months

      (L)            Sodomy in the first

                       degree, as defined in

                       ORS 163.405........................................................ 100 months

      (M)           Sodomy in the second

                       degree, as defined in

                       ORS 163.395.......................................................... 75 months

      (N)           Unlawful sexual

                           penetration in the first

                           degree, as defined

                           in ORS 163.411............................................... 100 months

      (O)           Unlawful sexual

                           penetration in the

                           second degree, as

                           defined in ORS 163.408.................................... 75 months

      (P)            Sexual abuse in the

                           first degree, as

                           defined in

                           ORS 163.427..................................................... 75 months

      (Q)           Robbery in the first

                           degree, as defined in

                           ORS 164.415..................................................... 90 months

      (R)           Robbery in the second

                           degree, as defined in

                           ORS 164.405..................................................... 70 months

      (b)(A)       Arson in the first degree,

                           as defined in

                           ORS 164.325, when

                           the offense represented

                           a threat of serious

                           physical injury.................................................... 90 months

      (B)           Using a child in a display

                           of sexually explicit

                           conduct, as defined in

                           ORS 163.670..................................................... 70 months

      (C)           Compelling prostitution,

                           as defined in

                           ORS 167.017..................................................... 70 months

___________________________________________________________________

 

      (5) If a person charged with an offense under this section is found guilty of a lesser included offense and the lesser included offense is:

      (a) An offense listed in subsection (4) of this section, the court shall sentence the person as provided in subsection (2) of this section.

      (b) Not an offense listed in subsection (4) of this section:

      (A) But constitutes an offense for which waiver is authorized under ORS 419C.349, the court, upon motion of the district attorney, shall hold a hearing to determine whether to retain jurisdiction or to transfer the case to juvenile court for disposition. In determining whether to retain jurisdiction, the court shall consider the criteria for waiver in ORS 419C.349. If the court retains jurisdiction, the court shall sentence the person as an adult under sentencing guidelines. If the court does not retain jurisdiction, the court shall:

      (i) Order that a presentence report be prepared;

      (ii) Set forth in a memorandum any observations and recommendations that the court deems appropriate; and

      (iii) Enter an order transferring the case to the juvenile court for disposition under ORS 419C.067 and 419C.411.

      (B) And is not an offense for which waiver is authorized under ORS 419.349, the court may not sentence the person. The court shall:

      (i) Order that a presentence report be prepared;

      (ii) Set forth in a memorandum any observations and recommendations that the court deems appropriate; and

      (iii) Enter an order transferring the case to the juvenile court for disposition under ORS 419C.067 and 419C.411.

      (6) When a person is charged under this section, other offenses based on the same act or transaction shall be charged as separate counts in the same accusatory instrument and consolidated for trial, whether or not the other offenses are aggravated murder or offenses listed in subsection (4) of this section. If it appears, upon motion, that the state or the person charged is prejudiced by the joinder and consolidation of offenses, the court may order an election or separate trials of counts or provide whatever other relief justice requires.

      (7)(a) If a person charged and tried as provided in subsection (6) of this section is found guilty of aggravated murder or an offense listed in subsection (4) of this section and one or more other offenses, the court shall impose the sentence for aggravated murder or the offense listed in subsection (4) of this section as provided in subsection (2) of this section and shall impose sentences for the other offenses as otherwise provided by law.

      (b) If a person charged and tried as provided in subsection (6) of this section is not found guilty of aggravated murder or an offense listed in subsection (4) of this section, but is found guilty of one of the other charges that constitutes an offense for which waiver is authorized under ORS 419C.349, the court, upon motion of the district attorney, shall hold a hearing to determine whether to retain jurisdiction or to transfer the case to juvenile court for disposition. In determining whether to retain jurisdiction, the court shall consider the criteria for waiver in ORS 419C.349. If the court retains jurisdiction, the court shall sentence the person as an adult under sentencing guidelines. If the court does not retain jurisdiction, the court shall:

      (A) Order that a presentence report be prepared;

      (B) Set forth in a memorandum any observations and recommendations that the court deems appropriate; and

      (C) Enter an order transferring the case to the juvenile court for disposition under ORS 419C.067 and 419C.411.

      SECTION 13. ORS 144.122 is amended to read:

      144.122. (1) After the initial parole release date has been set under ORS 144.120 and after a minimum period of time established by the board under subsection (2)(a) of this section, the prisoner may request that the parole release date be reset to an earlier date. The board may grant the request upon a determination by the board that continued incarceration is cruel and inhumane and that resetting the release date to an earlier date is not incompatible with the best interests of the prisoner and society and that the prisoner:

      (a) Has demonstrated an extended course of conduct indicating outstanding reformation;

      (b) Suffers from a severe medical condition including terminal illness; or

      (c) Is elderly and is permanently incapacitated in such a manner that the prisoner is unable to move from place to place without the assistance of another person.

      (2) The Advisory Commission on Prison Terms and Parole Standards may propose to the board and the board shall adopt rules:

      (a) Establishing minimum periods of time to be served by prisoners before application may be made for a reset of release date under subsection (1) of this section;

      (b) Detailing the criteria set forth under subsection (1) of this section for the resetting of a parole release date; and

      (c) Establishing criteria for parole release plans for prisoners released under this section that, at a minimum, must insure appropriate supervision and services for the person released.

      (3) The provisions of subsection (1)(b) of this section apply to prisoners sentenced in accordance with ORS 161.610.

      (4) The provisions of this section do not apply to prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of release or parole under ORS 163.150 or section 5 of this 1999 Act.

      SECTION 14. ORS 144.126 is amended to read:

      144.126. (1) The State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may advance the release date of a prisoner who was sentenced in accordance with rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission or ORS 161.610. The release date may be advanced if the board determines that continued incarceration is cruel and inhumane and that advancing the release date of the prisoner is not incompatible with the best interests of the prisoner and society and that the prisoner is:

      (a) Suffering from a severe medical condition including terminal illness; or

      (b) Elderly and permanently incapacitated in such a manner that the prisoner is unable to move from place to place without the assistance of another person.

      (2) The board shall adopt rules establishing criteria for release plans for prisoners released under this section that, at a minimum, must insure appropriate supervision and services for the person released.

      (3) The provisions of this section do not apply to prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of release or parole under ORS 163.150 or section 5 of this 1999 Act.

      SECTION 15. ORS 138.685 and 138.687 are repealed.

      SECTION 16. A copy of any document filed in any of the following proceedings shall be served personally on the defendant, even if the defendant is represented by counsel, by providing the copy to the custodian of the defendant, who shall ensure that the copy is provided promptly to the defendant:

      (1) A death warrant hearing under ORS 137.463.

      (2) A proceeding in which a person other than the defendant seeks to stay execution of the defendant's sentence of death.

      (3) A petition for post-conviction relief filed under ORS 138.510 (2).

 

Approved by the Governor September 1, 1999

 

Filed in the office of the Secretary of State September 1, 1999

 

Effective date October 23, 1999

__________