Chapter 3

3.014

(formerly 46.010)

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Where initial proceedings relating to misdemeanor criminal offense committed in Troutdale were conducted in Portland, defendant waived his right to have those proceedings which occurred prior to his objections conducted in Gresham. State v. Meyer, 51 Or App 527, 626 P2d 384 (1981), Sup Ct review denied

3.070

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Order signed in open court takes effect immediately upon signing. Strawn v. Farmers Insurance Co., 350 Or 336, ___ P3d ___ (2011)

3.130

NOTES OF DECISIONS

This section was not contravened when county granted authority to its infractions section to adjudicate infractions of county ordinances. Caffey v. Lane County, 298 Or 183, 691 P2d 94 (1984)

ORS 203.810 and not this section governs enforcement of county laws regulating private conduct, as distinct from jurisdiction of county courts under state laws or over “transaction of county business.” Caffey v. Lane County, 298 Or 183, 691 P2d 94 (1984)

3.132

(formerly 46.040)

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Scope of appellate court review of district court convictions of ordinance violations is equivalent to that available to persons appealing from district court convictions of state offenses. City of Portland v. Poindexter, 38 Or App 551, 590 P2d 781 (1979)

Under 1993 version of statute, dollar limitation on jurisdiction only modified reference to jurisdiction concurrent with circuit court, allowing district court to try Class A misdemeanors under grant of jurisdiction equal to justice court. State v. Webb, 324 Or 380, 927 P2d 79 (1996)

3.134

(formerly 46.047)

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Scope of appellate court review of district court convictions of ordinance violations is equivalent to that available to persons appealing from district court convictions of state offenses. City of Portland v. Poindexter, 38 Or App 551, 590 P2d 781 (1979)

3.136

(formerly 46.045)

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Scope of appellate court review of district court convictions of ordinance violations is equivalent to that available to persons appealing from district court convictions of state offenses. City of Portland v. Poindexter, 38 Or App 551, 590 P2d 781 (1979)

Multnomah County District Court has jurisdiction over all Portland city ordinance violations. State v. Jones, 45 Or App 307, 608 P2d 572 (1980), Sup Ct review denied

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Cities establishing own procedures for collection of fines for violation of city parking ordinances, (1984) Vol 44, p 67

3.220

LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 52 OLR 458 (1973)

3.235

(formerly 4.120, then 4.105)

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Application of jury requirements to all judicial districts of state, (1977) Vol 38, p 1462

3.250

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Psychiatric examinations of parents ordered by the court in connection with a child custody proceeding are “court services” and must be paid for accordingly. State ex rel Segrest v. Van Hoomissen, 276 Or 1077, 557 P2d 661 (1976)

3.265

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Transfer of juvenile court jurisdiction to circuit court for purpose of appointment of county judge to Executive Commission, (1977) Vol 38, p 1288

3.280

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Psychiatric examinations of parents ordered by the court in connection with a child custody proceeding are “court services” and must be paid for accordingly. State ex rel Segrest v. Van Hoomissen, 276 Or 1077, 557 P2d 661 (1976)