Chapter 254

254.005

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Proposed ballot question which asked voters to choose between two options, but not to approve or reject either, was measure as defined by this section, which did not satisfy requirements of this section to qualify for ballot placement. City of Eugene v. Roberts, 91 Or App 1, 756 P2d 643 (1988), aff’d 305 Or 641, 756 P2d 630 (1988)

254.030

See annotations under ORS 250.045.

254.035

See also annotations under ORS 250.230 in permanent edition.

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Application of Ore. Const. Art. II, §14a to election of city officers of all cities, (1973) Vol 36, p 697

254.085

See also annotations under ORS 250.020 in permanent edition.

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Entering new, judicially changed name of nominee on general election ballot, (1972) Vol 36, p 45

254.095

See also annotations under ORS 250.030 in permanent edition.

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Application of Ore. Const. Art. II, §14a to election of city officers of all cities, (1973) Vol 36, p 697

254.115

(formerly 249.354)

See also annotations under ORS 249.354 in permanent edition.

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Write-in vote for candidate who is a registered member of a different party than that of voter, (1978) Vol 38, p 2166

254.135

(formerly 250.110)

See also annotations under ORS 250.110 in permanent edition.

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Entering new, judicially changed name of nominee on general election ballot, (1972) Vol 36, p 45; constitutionality of 180-day party registration requirement, (1974) Vol 36, p 875; write-in vote for candidate who is a registered member of a different party than that of voter, (1978) Vol 38, p 2166

254.140

See annotations under ORS 250.305.

254.155

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Name rotation of entire ballot, (1980) Vol 40, p 346

254.165

See also annotations under ORS 250.161 in permanent edition.

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Once Secretary of State determined that plaintiffs’ certificates of nomination were not valid, she had duty to direct that plaintiffs’ names be removed from ballot. Goldstein v. Radokovich, 68 Or App 843, 683 P2d 149 (1984), Sup Ct review denied

254.185

See annotations under ORS 250.080 in permanent edition.

254.195

See annotations under ORS 250.090 in permanent edition.

254.205

NOTE: Repealed as of January 1, 2008; but see sec. 68, c. 154, Oregon Laws 2007

See annotations under ORS 250.121 in permanent edition.

254.215

NOTE: Repealed as of January 1, 2008; but see sec. 68, c. 154, Oregon Laws 2007

See annotations under ORS 250.150 in permanent edition.

254.325

NOTE: Repealed as of January 1, 2008; but see sec. 68, c. 154, Oregon Laws 2007

See annotations under ORS 250.340 in permanent edition.

254.365

See also annotations under ORS 249.366 in permanent edition.

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Unconstitutionality of requiring political parties to allow nonmembers to vote in primary elections, (1977) Vol 38, p 765; political party permitting voters who are not affiliated with such party to participate in primary election for choice of its candidates, (1981) Vol 41, p 466

254.385

NOTE: Repealed as of January 1, 2008; but see sec. 68, c. 154, Oregon Laws 2007

See annotations under ORS 250.645 in permanent edition.

254.405

NOTE: Repealed as of January 1, 2008; but see sec. 68, c. 154, Oregon Laws 2007

See annotations under ORS 250.655 in permanent edition.

254.410

See annotations under ORS 249.875.

254.415

See annotations under ORS 250.350 in permanent edition.

254.455

NOTE: Repealed as of January 1, 2008; but see sec. 68, c. 154, Oregon Laws 2007

See annotations under ORS 250.680 in permanent edition.

254.465

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Multiday period for submitting votes by mail does not violate federal law requiring that all general elections be held on same day. Voter Integrity Project, Inc. v. Keisling, 259 F3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S Ct 1536 (2002)

254.495

See annotations under ORS 250.471 in permanent edition.

254.505

See annotations under ORS 250.510 in permanent edition.

254.555

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Under former similar statute

Secretary of State has duty to withhold certification for general election of candidate who he knows is ineligible, even though candidate receives highest number of votes in primary election. McAlmond v. Myers, 262 Or 521, 500 P2d 457 (1972)