Chapter 291

291.040

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Reporting standards and requirements, (1977) Vol 38, p 1368

291.228

LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 42 WLR 489 (2006)

291.232 to 291.260

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Oregon Department of Administrative Services allotments to state agencies for payments based on government regulations restricting use of property, (2001) Vol 49, p 284

291.232

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Incurring and payment of expenses in excess of expenditure limitation, (1974) Vol 36, p 845

291.238

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Incurring and payment of expenses in excess of expenditure limitation, (1974) Vol 36, p 845; Oregon Department of Administrative Services allotments to state agencies for payments based on government regulations restricting use of property, (2001) Vol 49, p 284

291.244

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Oregon Department of Administrative Services allotments to state agencies for payments based on government regulations restricting use of property, (2001) Vol 49, p 284

291.246

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Incurring and payment of expenses in excess of expenditure limitation, (1974) Vol 36, p 845

291.254

NOTE: Repealed as of August 29, 2003

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Allotment reductions on selective agency-by-agency basis rather than proportionate across the board reductions, (1982) Vol 42, p 332

291.258

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Where Personnel Division had responsibility under this section and ORS 240.215, [former] ORS 240.220 and ORS 240.235 for classification and compensation plans for classified service, Forestry Department did not have authority to promulgate directive binding division to include within restructuring-reclassification proposal request for salary increases for all employes placed into classification with higher salary range. Berry v. State Forestry Dept., 35 Or App 703, 582 P2d 473 (1978), Sup Ct review denied

291.322 to 291.336

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Constitutionality of the Emergency Board, (1974) Vol 37, p 130; constitutionality of Legislature’s grant of powers to Emergency Board, (1978) Vol 38, p 825

LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 55 OLR 197-220 (1976)

291.322

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority of the Emergency Board to provide funds for administration and enforcement of Oregon Laws 1973, c. 421, (1973) Vol 36, p 595

291.324

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Emergency Board does not have supervisory power over administrative agency decisions authorized by statute. Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Dept. of Human Resources, 297 Or 562, 687 P2d 785 (1984)

291.326

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Where Personnel Division had statutory responsibility for classification and compensation plans for classified service, Forestry Department lacked authority to promulgate directive requiring division, as part of reclassification proposal, to submit to Emergency Board request for salary increases for all employes placed into classification with higher salary range. Berry v. State Forestry Dept., 35 Or App 703, 582 P2d 473 (1978), Sup Ct review denied

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority of the Emergency Board to provide funds for administration and enforcement of Oregon Laws 1973, c. 421, (1973) Vol 36, p 595; limitations on allocations by the Emergency Board, (1976) Vol 37, p 1125

291.344

See annotations under ORS 407.210 in permanent edition.

291.349

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Refund of excess revenue received is not tax overpayment subject to offset under ORS 314.415 for tax, penalty or interest owed. Parr v. Dept. of Revenue, 18 OTR 1 (2004)

291.355

NOTE: Repealed as of August 10, 2001

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Repayment of War Veterans Fund moneys transferred to General Fund, (1988) Vol 46, p 78, clarified (1989) Vol 46, p 245

291.371

NOTES OF DECISIONS

There is no requirement that Emergency Board approve upward reclassifications of classified employes where no interim budgetary adjustment is necessary for salary increases. Berry v. State Forestry Dept., 35 Or App 703, 582 P2d 473 (1978), Sup Ct review denied

Where employe was dismissed for refusal to transfer to Portland in reclassified position, and he claimed that employer’s actions, taken without approval of legislative review agency, violated this section, findings of fact on issue of employer’s good faith were required. Ashman v. Children’s Services Division, 37 Or App 865, 588 P2d 665 (1978)

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Expenditures with respect to employes in unclassified service for life and disability insurance, physical examinations, and physical fitness programs, (1978) Vol 38, p 1770

291.990

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Incurring and payment of expenses in excess of expenditure limitation, (1974) Vol 36, p 845