Chapter 310
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 5 EL 516 (1975)
310.060
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Collection of
1972-73 as unaffected by proposed constitutional amendment, (1972) Vol 36, p 52; levying of taxes prior to voter approval,
(1975) Vol 37, p 801
310.065
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Certification of
levies upon voter approval, (1975) Vol 37, p 801
310.070
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Taxpayer
may petition department to advise assessor on levy extension but may not use
petition to department to have levy declared invalid. Beal v. Dept. of Rev., 13
OTR 54 (1994)
310.090
NOTES OF DECISIONS
As
to rounding up so as not to lose any part of levy in arriving at statutorily
required “even amount of dollars and cents”, tax rate is only way of expressing
levy and calculating rate is part of levy process thus requiring that assessors
provide procedure to ensure that excess is not assessed. Dennehy
v. Dept. of Revenue, 305 Or 595, 756 P2d 13 (1988)
310.105
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 51 OLR 200 (1971)
310.125
NOTE:
Repealed as of January 1, 2006
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Section as
constitutional under city home rule provisions, (1971) Vol
35, p 793
310.143
NOTES OF DECISIONS
City
storm drainage user charge based upon amount of “impervious surface area on a
property” is within limits of section 11b, Article XI of Oregon Constitution,
and must be imposed and collected in accordance with this section. Dennehy v. City of Gresham, 12 OTR 194 (1992), aff’d 314 Or 600, 841 P2d 633 (1992)
310.150
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Using
certification by taxing district of tax on frozen base to determine appropriate
category for tax that district imposes on urban renewal increment of property
violates section 11, Article XI of Oregon Constitution. Shilo
Inn v. Multnomah County, 333 Or 101, 36 P3d 954 (2001), modified 334 Or
11, 45 P3d 107 (2002)
310.155
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Categorization
of levy follows categorization of taxing district unless sole purpose of levy
is for services falling within different category. Glenn v. Morrow County
Unified Recreation District, 14 OTR 344 (1998)
Cocurricular activities of taxing district that are
provided within school context are educational services. Glenn v. Morrow County
Unified Recreation District, 14 OTR 344 (1998)
Limiting
categorization of mixed use levy proceeds to only one category violates
requirements of section 11b, Article XI of Oregon Constitution. Urhausen v. City of Eugene, 18 OTR 395 (2006), aff’d 341 Or 246, 142 P3d 1023 (2006)
310.200 to 310.242
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Authority
to assess at permanent rate is independent of any consideration of needs or
resources of school district. Luedtke v. Estacada
School District #108, 16 OTR 114 (2002)
310.395
See
annotations under ORS 280.075.
310.622
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Homestead as
applied to a shareholder-tenant in a cooperative apartment, (1971) Vol 35, p 897
310.630 to 310.690
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Homestead as
applied to a shareholder-tenant in a cooperative apartment, (1971) Vol 35, p 897
310.692
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Subsequent revision
by Rev. Dept. of property tax relief reduction, (1981), Vol
42, p 84; Property tax relief as obligation against state. (1981), Vol 42, p 84