Chapter 390
390.120 to 390.150
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Department of
Transportation authority to solicit gifts, grants, etc., (1978) Vol 38, p 2105
390.124
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS
Under former similar statute
Authority
of the State Highway Commission to charge out-of-state campers a higher fee
than Oregon residents for use of state parks, (1973) Vol
36, p 329
390.160
See
annotations under ORS 390.124.
390.235
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 25 EL 463 (1995)
390.237
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 25 EL 463 (1995)
390.310 to 390.368
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Scenic easements
under Willamette River Greenway law, (1974) Vol 36, p
1060; binding effect on governmental agencies of the adoption of interim
Willamette River Greenway boundaries, (1975) Vol 37,
p 894; no accompanying public right to use or trespass, (1976) Vol 38, p 91; whether “ordinary low water” means as
affected by United States Corps of Engineer dams, (1977) Vol
38, p 1295; inclusion of Coast Fork of Willamette River under Willamette River
Greenway restrictions, (1979) Vol 39, p 577
390.314
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Scenic easements
under Willamette River Greenway law, (1974) Vol 36, p
1060; state-wide planning goal in conjunction with interim Willamette River
Greenway boundaries, (1975) Vol 37, p 894
390.332
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Scenic easements
under Willamette River Greenway law, (1974) Vol 36, p
1060; authority of state over use of land along Willamette River under Greenway
law, (1975) Vol 37, p 515; private property within
the Willamette River Greenway, (1976) Vol 38, p 123
390.334
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Scenic easements
under Willamette River Greenway law, (1974) Vol 36, p
1060; authority of state over use of land along Willamette River under Greenway
law, (1975) Vol 37, p 515
390.605
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority to issue
permit for removal of ocean shore natural products from state recreation areas,
(1974) Vol 36, p 807; role of Highway Division in
removal of driftwood logs from ocean shores, (1975) Vol
37, p 420
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 365 (1974);
22 EL 731 (1992)
390.610 to 390.770
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Effect of
constitutional provision requiring payments based on government regulations
restricting use of property, (2001) Vol 49, p 284
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 20 EL 1001 (1990);
35 WLR 183 (1999)
390.610
NOTES OF DECISIONS
The
Oregon statutes, confirming public rights or easements along the ocean shore to
be held and administered as state recreation areas, is constitutional. Hay v.
Bruno, 344 F Supp 286 (1972)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority to issue
permit for removal of ocean shore natural products from state recreation areas,
(1974) Vol 36, p 807; role of Highway Division in
removal of driftwood logs from ocean shores, (1975) Vol
37, p 420
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 385, 409
(1974); 22 EL 731 (1992); 77 OLR 913 (1998)
390.615
NOTES OF DECISIONS
In
absence of allegations that state or hotel knew of dangerous surf, neither
could be held liable for failure to warn. Fuhrer v. Gearhart By The Sea, Inc.,
306 Or 434, 760 P2d 874 (1988)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority to issue
permit for removal of ocean shore natural products from state recreation areas,
(1974) Vol 36, p 807; role of Highway Division in
removal of driftwood logs from ocean shores, (1975) Vol
37, p 420
390.620
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 383-388
(1974)
390.630
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority to issue
permit for removal of ocean shore natural products from state recreation areas,
(1974) Vol 36, p 807
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 363 (1974)
390.635
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority to issue
permit for removal of ocean shore natural products from state recreation areas,
(1974) Vol 36, p 807; role of Highway Division in
removal of driftwood logs from ocean shores, (1975) Vol
37, p 420
390.640
NOTES OF DECISIONS
The
Oregon statutes, confirming public rights or easements along the ocean shore to
be held and administered as state recreation areas, is constitutional. Hay v.
Bruno, 344 F Supp 286 (1972)
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 348, 386
(1974)
390.660
NOTES OF DECISIONS
The
authority of the State of Oregon without reference to protection of the public’s
recreation lands and rights in land along the ocean shores is vested
exclusively in the Department of Transportation. State ex rel
Johnson v. Bauman, 7 Or App 479, 492 P2d 284 (1971)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Role of Highway
Division in removal of driftwood logs from ocean shores, (1975) Vol 37, p 420
390.705
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Role of Highway
Division in removal of driftwood logs from ocean shores, (1975) Vol 37, p 420
390.715
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Effect of
constitutional provision requiring payments based on government regulations
restricting use of property, (2001) Vol 49, p 284
390.725
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority to issue
permit for removal of ocean shore natural products from state recreation areas,
(1974) Vol 36, p 807; role of Highway Division in
removal of driftwood logs from ocean shores, (1975) Vol
37, p 420
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 348 (1974)
390.805 to 390.925
NOTES OF DECISIONS
An
easement is not involved in the state’s right under these sections to regulate
use of related adjacent land, but an easement is an additional right which the
state may acquire by purchase or gift. Scott v. State Hwy. Comm., 23 Or App 99,
541 P2d 516 (1975)
Time
factors involved are not designed to freeze land values to subsidize later
acquisition by the state, nor do they impose unreasonable restraints upon
landowners. Scott v. State Hwy. Comm., 23 Or App 99, 541 P2d 516 (1975)
The
regulatory provisions are separate from the provisions giving the state the
right to acquire land or interests in related adjacent land, and the state does
not gain an interest in land by the adoption of the Act. Scott v. State Hwy.
Comm., 23 Or App 99, 541 P2d 516 (1975)
The
state’s power to regulate is analogous to zoning restrictions and therefore the
state does not acquire an interest for which compensation must be paid. Scott
v. State Hwy. Comm., 23 Or App 99, 541 P2d 516 (1975)
Where
water would otherwise flow through scenic waterway, provisions of Scenic
Waterways Act requiring showing that proposed diversion was necessary to
beneficial use applied to proposed diversion in city’s application for permit
to operate hydroelectric facility. Diack v. City of
Portland, 306 Or 287, 759 P2d 1070 (1988)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Prohibition of
landfills on scenic waterways, (1971) Vol 35, p 844;
authority to designate segment of Snake River as a scenic waterway, (1972) Vol 35, p 1226; definition and regulation of “placer
mining,” (1982) Vol. 42, p 213
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 299-303,
373-376 (1974); 19 EL 841 (1989); 21 EL 133 (1991); 29 WLR 95 (1993)
390.805
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority to
designate segment of Snake River as a scenic waterway, (1972) Vol 35, p 1226
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 301 (1974);
21 EL 133 (1991)
390.815
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 301 (1974)
390.825
NOTE:
Repealed December 8, 1988; ORS 390.826 enacted in lieu
See
annotations under ORS 390.826.
390.826
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS
Under former similar statute (ORS
390.825)
Application
of Scenic Waterways Act to future expansion of City of Maupin boundaries,
(1977) Vol 38, p 697
390.835
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Where
petitioner challenges Water Resources Commission’s temporary rule amending OAR
690-80-060 (5)(c), Commission’s findings and statement of need do not provide
adequate support for promulgation of temporary rule and rule was therefore
adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures and violates
Scenic Waterways Act. Waterwatch of Oregon v. Oregon
Water Res. Comm., 97 Or App 1, 774 P2d 1118 (1989)
“Mitigation”
must be designed to fully offset ground water appropriation impacts on surface
flows. WaterWatch v. Water Resources Commission, 199
Or App 598, 112 P3d 443 (2005)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Whether federal designation
of portion of John Day River as scenic would supersede state law, (1977) Vol 38, p 1321; definition of “placer mining,” (1982) Vol 42, p 213; prohibition on placer mining in scenic
waterways, (1994) Vol 47, p 84
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 19 EL 860 (1989);
36 EL 1125 (2006)
390.845
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Value
of improvements upon land condemned pursuant to ORS 390.805 to 390.925 is
measured as of date of taking, and not as of date of Act, where development of
land began before effective date of Act. State Hwy. Comm. v. Chaparral
Recreation Assn., 13 Or App 346, 510 P2d 352 (1973)
Provisions
of this section authorizing condemnation of “related adjacent land” (for which,
despite department’s disapproval, owner proposed and refused to abandon plan
substantially impairing natural beauty of scenic waterway) were
constitutionally applied where there was substantial evidence that taking
landowners’ property was reasonably necessary and that they had made no timely
and effective abandonment of objectionable proposal. State ex rel Dept. of Trans. v. Hilderbrand,
35 Or App 403, 582 P2d 13 (1978)
Structures
and buildings erected in connection with existing use are subject to prior
notice requirement unless exempted by department rule. State Dept. of Trans. v.
Solomon, 57 Or App 72, 643 P2d 1312 (1982), Sup Ct review denied
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority to
designate segment of Snake River as a scenic waterway, (1972) Vol 35, p 1226
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 301 (1974);
19 EL 853 (1989)
390.855
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 4 EL 302 (1974);
19 EL 852 (1989)