Chapter 416
416.010 to 416.270
NOTE:
Subject sections all subsequently repealed
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Determination
by Public Welfare Division that person suffering from excessive alcoholism
resulting in paranoid schizophrenia was disabled held sufficient for assessment
against parent for charges incurred under this Act. Cannon v. Juras, 17 Or App 193, 521 P2d 9 (1974)
These
sections, constituting the former Relatives Responsibility Law, do not violate
due process. Reed v. Pub. Welfare Div., 19 Or App 927, 529 P2d 941 (1974)
416.010 to 416.340
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 69 OLR 689 (1990)
416.010
NOTE:
Repealed as of August 2, 2001
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Person
does not qualify as “dependent” unless all criteria listed in definition are
met. McDonald v. Pub. Welfare Div., 21 Or App 290, 534 P2d 1158 (1975)
416.030
NOTE:
Repealed as of August 2, 2001
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Expulsion
from home must be accompanied with bad purpose or wrongful intent on part of
parent if child is to be exempt. Cheatham v. Juras,
11 Or App 108, 501 P2d 988 (1972); Cannon v. Juras,
15 Or App 265, 515 P2d 428 (1973)
For
purpose of exemption granted child who became dependent child, “wilfully” modifies both “deserted” and “or abandoned.”
Mitchell v. Pub. Welfare Div., 19 Or App 689, 528 P2d 1371 (1974)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Status of
responsible relative of needy recipient when responsible relative is also
subject to payment of support for another relative in state institution, (1973)
Vol 36, p 608
416.050
NOTE:
Repealed as of August 2, 2001
NOTES OF DECISIONS
In
absence of some compelling reason, proper guide for exercise of discretion to
reduce relative’s contribution ought to be scale contained in [former] ORS
416.061. Smith v. Juras, 14 Or App 442, 513 P2d 824
(1973)
416.061
NOTE:
Repealed as of August 2, 2001
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Mere
offer of assistance does not discharge responsible relative’s obligation to
contribute to public assistance granted. Thome v. Juras, 12 Or App 501, 507 P2d 1154 (1973)
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 22 WLR 571, 572
(1986)
416.350
(formerly
414.105)
NOTES OF DECISIONS
For
purposes of recovering from estate of medical assistance recipient, life estate
is valued immediately prior to death regardless of when life estate was
created. State Department of Human Services v. Willingham, 206 Or App 156, 136
P3d 66 (2006)
416.400 to 416.470
NOTES OF DECISIONS
DHR
could not require custodial parent to reimburse for public assistance provided
minor child where child left parent’s home without permission and without
cause. Department of Human Resources v. McGraw, 68 Or App 834, 683 P2d 154
(1984), Sup Ct review denied
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 69 OLR 692 (1990)
416.422
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Prohibition
on collection of “past support” for period before October 1995 does not bar
recovery of support qualifying as state debt prior to 1995 amendment. State ex rel Department of Human Resources v. Lewelling,
156 Or App 7, 964 P2d 1104 (1998)
416.430
NOTES OF DECISIONS
DNA
testing to establish paternity does not violate state or federal constitutional
guarantees against unreasonable search and seizure. Department of Justice v.
Spring, 201 Or App 367, 120 P3d 1 (2005), Sup Ct review denied
416.440
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Clerk
is required to enter administrative order upon receipt of administrative order
and other listed documents, regardless of whether administrative order will
require court review to become effective. Wessels and
Wessels, 214 Or App 545, 166 P3d 576 (2007)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Acquisition of judgment
debtor’s interest in mutual fund to recover moneys owed state, (1994) Vol 47, p 173
416.510 to 416.610
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Prior right of
Motor Vehicles Accident Fund or Adult and Family Services Division to
reimbursement for costs of medical services provided indigent, (1980) Vol 41, p 257
416.540
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Where
assistance grants were made to children, settlements due parents were subject
to lien because “recipient” refers to family unit rather than individuals.
Christensen v. AFSD, 122 Or App 71, 857 P2d 162 (1993)
Recovery
against settlement of personal injury claim is prohibited except to extent that
settling party’s legal liability is related to need for Medicaid-funded
treatment. AFSD v. Northland Ins. Co., 139 Or App 92, 911 P2d 942 (1996), Sup
Ct review denied
Recipient
of settlement for personal injury allegedly related to need for treatment may
not assert lack of causation as defense against lien. AFSD v. Northland Ins.
Co., 139 Or App 92, 911 P2d 942 (1996), Sup Ct review denied
Medical,
surgical and hospital expenses are “incurred” by recipient only to extent that
recipient has paid or is legally obligated to pay expenses at time of
settlement. King v. Adult and Family Services Division, 142 Or App 444, 921 P2d
1326 (1996)
416.610
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Duty
of parents to support children continues after children are committed to secure
custody of juvenile authorities. Van Daam v. Hegstrom, 88 Or App 40, 744 P2d 269 (1987), Sup Ct review
denied