Chapter 508

LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 12 EL 81 (1981)

508.025

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Chinook Indians do not have treaty right to fish usual and accustomed sites other than right gained by affiliation to fish usual and accustomed fishing grounds of Quinault Indians. State v. Goodell, 84 Or App 398, 734 P2d 10 (1987), Sup Ct review denied

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: License requirements and poundage tax on shell fish raised in enclosed tanks not connected to public waters of state, (1977) Vol 38, p 1549

508.235

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Chinook Indians do not have treaty right to fish usual and accustomed sites other than right gained by affiliation to fish usual and accustomed fishing grounds of Quinault Indians. State v. Goodell, 84 Or App 398, 734 P2d 10 (1987), Sup Ct review denied

508.240

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority of the Fish and Game Commission to regulate sales of fish by Indians fishing under their treaty rights, (1973) Vol 36, p 531

508.710

NOTES OF DECISIONS

Where Fish and Wildlife Commission held that there was lack of conclusive evidence to determine whether proposed salmon hatchery permits would violate this section, it could not issue permits for purpose of testing. Federation of Independent Seafood Harvesters v. Fish & Wildlife Comm., 46 Or App 659, 612 P2d 765 (1980), aff’d 291 Or 452, 632 P2d 765 (1981)

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Denial of permits, (1975) Vol 37, p 945

508.730

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority of Fish and Wildlife Commission to determine when fish production needs of state have been met, (1981) Vol. 42, p 161

508.941

NOTES OF DECISIONS

“Applicant” whose history of participation is considered is individual operating or seeking permit for vessel. Mar Pacifico, Inc. v. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, 148 Or App 310, 939 P2d 637 (1997)

Reasons for failure of former owner of vessel to meet licensing qualifications are attributable to new owner of vessel. Mar Pacifico, Inc. v. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, 148 Or App 310, 939 P2d 637 (1997)